Skip to main content
Top

09-06-2017 | Biosimilars | Article

Efficacy and Safety of Switching from Innovator Rituximab to Biosimilar CT-P10 Compared with Continued Treatment with CT-P10: Results of a 56-Week Open-Label Study in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis

Journal: BioDrugs

Authors: Won Park, Chang-Hee Suh, Seung Cheol Shim, Francisco Fidencio Cons Molina, Slawomir Jeka, Francisco G. Medina-Rodriguez, Pawel Hrycaj, Piotr Wiland, Eun Young Lee, Pavel Shesternya, Volodymyr Kovalenko, Leysan Myasoutova, Marina Stanislav, Sebastiao Radominski, Mie Jin Lim, Jung-Yoon Choe, Sang Joon Lee, Sung Young Lee, Sung Hwan Kim, Dae Hyun Yoo

Publisher: Springer International Publishing

Abstract

Background

CT-P10 is a biosimilar candidate of innovator rituximab (RTX) that demonstrated a comparable clinical profile to RTX in a phase I randomized controlled trial (RCT) in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01534884).

Objective

This open-label extension (OLE) study (NCT01873443) compared the efficacy and safety of CT-P10 in patients with RA who received CT-P10 from the outset (i.e., from the start of the RCT and also in the OLE; ‘maintenance group’) with those who received RTX during the RCT and switched to CT-P10 during the OLE (‘switch group’).

Methods

Patients who completed the RCT were recruited. Based on the Disease Activity Score using 28 joints (DAS28) and predefined safety criteria, patients could receive up to two courses of CT-P10 during the OLE. Efficacy [DAS28 and European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) response], safety and immunogenicity were assessed.

Results

Eighty-seven patients were enrolled; 58 and 29 had previously received CT-P10 or RTX, respectively, in the RCT. Of these, 38 (65.5%) and 20 (69.0%) were treated with CT-P10 in the OLE and therefore comprised the maintenance and switch groups, respectively. The mean change in DAS28-erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) from baseline (week 0 of RCT) at week 24 of the first OLE treatment course in the maintenance and switch groups was −2.7 and −2.4, respectively. The proportion of patients with good/moderate EULAR responses was also comparable between groups. Antidrug antibodies were detected in 13.2 and 15.0% of patients in the maintenance and switch groups, respectively, at week 24 of the first OLE course. CT-P10 treatment was well-tolerated when administered for up to 2 years or after switching from RTX.

Conclusion

In this study population, comparable efficacy and safety profiles were observed in patients who switched from RTX to CT-P10 and those maintained on CT-P10 throughout treatment.
Literature
1.
Weiner GJ. Rituximab: mechanism of action. Sem Hematol. 2010;47:115–23.CrossRef
2.
Edwards JCW, Cambridge G. B-cell targeting in rheumatoid arthritis and other autoimmune diseases. Nat Rev Immunol. 2006;6:394–403.CrossRefPubMed
3.
Lopez-Olivo MA, Amezaga Urruela M, McGahan L, et al. Rituximab for rheumatoid arthritis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015;1:CD007356.
4.
Tak PP, Rigby W, Rubbert-Roth A, et al. Sustained inhibition of progressive joint damage with rituximab plus methotrexate in early active rheumatoid arthritis: 2-year results from the randomised controlled trial IMAGE. Ann Rheum Dis. 2012;71:351–7.CrossRefPubMed
5.
Singh JA, Saag KG, Bridges SL Jr, et al. 2015 American College of Rheumatology guideline for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2016;68:1–26.PubMed
6.
Smolen JS, Landewe R, Breedveld FC, et al. EULAR recommendations for the management of rheumatoid arthritis with synthetic and biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs. Ann Rheum Dis. 2010;69:964–75.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
7.
Kuek A, Hazleman BL, Ostor AJ. Immune-mediated inflammatory diseases (IMIDs) and biologic therapy: a medical revolution. Postgrad Med J. 2007;83:251–60.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
8.
World Health Organization. Expert Committee on Biological Standardization: Geneva, 19 to 23 October 2009. Guidelines on evaluation of similar biotherapeutic products (SBPs). 2009. http://​www.​who.​int/​biologicals/​areas/​biological_​therapeutics/​BIOTHERAPEUTICS_​FOR_​WEB_​22APRIL2010.​pdf. Accessed 14 Feb 2017.
9.
Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use (CHMP). European Medicines Agency. Guideline on Similar Biological Medicine Products. 23 October 2014. CHMP/437/04 Rev 1. 2014. http://​www.​ema.​europa.​eu/​docs/​en_​GB/​document_​library/​Scientific_​guideline/​2014/​10/​WC500176768.​pdf. Accessed 14 Feb 2017.
10.
US Department of Health and Human Services; Food and Drug Administration; Center for Drug Evaluation and Research (CDER); Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research (CBER). Quality considerations in demonstrating biosimilarity of a therapeutic protein product to a reference product. Guidance for Industry. 2015. http://​www.​fda.​gov/​downloads/​drugs/​guidancecomplian​ceregulatoryinfo​rmation/​guidances/​ucm291134.​pdf. Accessed 14 Feb 2017.
11.
Yoo DH, Suh C, Shim SC, et al. A multicentre randomised controlled trial to compare the pharmacokinetics, efficacy and safety of CT-P10 and innovator rituximab in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Ann Rheum Dis. 2017;76(3):566–70.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
12.
Yoo DH, Suh C, Shim SC, et al. Efficacy and safety of rituximab biosimilar candidate (CT-P10) and innovator rituximab in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: results from phase I randomized controlled trial over 72 weeks [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2015;67(Suppl 10):2449–52.
13.
Generics and Biosimilars Initiative (GaBI). EMA approval for rituximab biosimilar Truxima. 2017. http://​www.​gabionline.​net/​Biosimilars/​News/​EMA-approval-for-rituximab-biosimilar-Truxima. Accessed 14 Feb 2017.
14.
Prevoo MLL, van’t Hof MA, Kuper HH, et al. Modified disease activity scores that include twenty-eight-joint counts development and validation in a prospective longitudinal study of patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum. 1995;38:44–8.CrossRefPubMed
15.
van Gestel AM, Prevoo ML, van’t Hof MA, et al. Development and validation of the European League Against Rheumatism response criteria for rheumatoid arthritis. Comparison with the preliminary American College of Rheumatology and the World Health Organization/International League Against Rheumatism Criteria. Arthritis Rheum. 1996;39:34–40.CrossRefPubMed
16.
Keystone E, Fleischmann R, Emery P, et al. Safety and efficacy of additional courses of rituximab in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis: an open-label extension analysis. Arthritis Rheum. 2007;56:3896–908.CrossRefPubMed
17.
Keystone EC, Cohen SB, Emery P, et al. Multiple courses of rituximab produce sustained clinical and radiographic efficacy and safety in patients with rheumatoid arthritis and an inadequate response to 1 or more tumor necrosis factor inhibitors: 5-year data from the REFLEX study. J Rheumatol. 2012;39:2238–46.CrossRefPubMed
18.
Van Vollenhoven RF, Emery P, Bingham CO, et al. Long-term safety of patients receiving rituximab in rheumatoid arthritis clinical trials. J Rheumatol. 2010;37:558–67.CrossRefPubMed
19.
Davis-Ajami ML, Wu J, Downton K, et al. Epoetin zeta in the management of anemia associated with chronic kidney disease, differential pharmacology and clinical utility. Biologics. 2014;8:155–67.PubMedPubMedCentral
20.
Flodmark CE, Lilja K, Woehling H, et al. Switching from originator to biosimilar human growth hormone using dialogue teamwork: single-center experience from Sweden. Biol Ther. 2013;3:35–43.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
21.
Wizemann V, Rutkowski B, Baldamus C, et al. Comparison of the therapeutic effects of epoetin zeta to epoetin alfa in the maintenance phase of renal anaemia treatment. Curr Med Res Opin. 2008;24:625–37.CrossRefPubMed
22.
Park W, Yoo DH, Miranda P, et al. Efficacy and safety of switching from reference infliximab to CT-P13 compared with maintenance of CT-P13 in ankylosing spondylitis: 102-week data from the PLANETAS extension study. Ann Rheum Dis. 2016;76:346–54.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
23.
Yoo DH, Prodanovic N, Jaworski J, et al. Efficacy and safety of CT-P13 (biosimilar infliximab) in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: comparison between switching from reference infliximab to CT-P13 and continuing CT-P13 in the PLANETRA extension study. Ann Rheum Dis. 2016;76:355–63.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral