Original ArticleChoice of Lumbar Spine Bone Density Reference Database for Fracture Prediction in Men and Women: A Population-Based Analysis
Introduction
Bone mineral density (BMD) assessment with dual energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) is well established in the diagnosis of osteoporosis and for fracture risk assessment in postmenopausal women 1, 2. The diagnosis of osteoporosis in men remains more controversial, and in a review, Khosla et al (3) concluded that the most appropriate definition for osteoporosis in men, in the absence of fractures, was a major unresolved issue and should be the focus of future research.
Since 2001 the International Society for Clinical Densitometry Official Position was to use young female reference data in women and young male reference data in men for T-scores until additional data could clarify the BMD-fracture risk relationship in men (4). Several prospective studies have now shown that men and women with identical hip BMD have the same fracture rates if all other risk factors are the same 5, 6, 7. Therefore, the World Health Organization recently has clarified diagnostic criteria for postmenopausal women by emphasizing a reference site (femoral neck) and reference population (white women ages 20–29 yr based upon the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey) (8).
The 2013 International Society for Clinical Densitometry Position Development Conference, after considering the new data available on the BMD-fracture risk relationship in men, recommended “Use a uniform Caucasian (nonrace adjusted) female reference for men of all ethnic groups” (J. Schousboe, personal communication). This recommendation was assigned a grade of “Fair” based upon the paucity of nonhip BMD data, and most particularly the lack of equivalent lumbar spine data, since this is one of the primary clinical assessment sites for DXA. Therefore, this question was specifically addressed in the population-based Canadian Multicentre Osteoporosis Study (CaMos) cohort, one of the first population-based cohorts to include both men and women.
Section snippets
Study Population
The study sample was selected from participants in an ongoing population-based longitudinal cohort study, the CaMos. We included all CaMos participants ages 50 and over at study entry for whom follow-up data and lumbar spine BMD measurements were available.
The methodological details of CaMos have been described elsewhere (9). In brief, eligible participants were at least 25 yr of age at the start of the study, lived within a 50-km radius of 1 of 9 Canadian cities (St John's, Halifax, Quebec
Results
There were 4745 eligible women and 1887 eligible men who were similar with respect to mean age (women 65.8 yr vs men 65.3 years, p = 0.021). Women had a significantly greater prevalence of previous fracture, parental hip fracture, and rheumatoid arthritis, whereas men had a greater prevalence of current smoking and high alcohol intake (Table 1). As expected, mean lumbar spine BMD was significantly greater in men than women (p < 0.001).
Mean follow-up for men was 8.3 years vs 8.7 years for women (
Discussion
We found that unadjusted risk of incident major osteoporotic fractures were much less in men (approximately half) that in women. As expected, mean lumbar spine BMD was greater in men than women overall and when stratified by fracture status. The finding of greater mean BMD in men with (or without) low-trauma fracture is attributed to the sex-related difference in BMD distribution rather than an intrinsic difference in skeletal fragility. In fact, men were at slightly lower (not higher) major
Acknowledgments
We thank all those participants in CaMos whose careful responses and attendance made this analysis possible. The Canadian Multicentre Osteoporosis Study is supported by Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR), Amgen Canada Inc, Dairy Farmers of Canada, Merck Canada Eli Lilly Canada, and Novartis Canada. Disclosures: William D. Leslie: Speaker bureau: Amgen, Eli Lilly, Novartis. Research grants: Novartis, Amgen, Genzyme. David Goltzman serves as a consultant for Eli Lily, Novartis, Merck,
References (17)
- et al.
A reference standard for the description of osteoporosis
Bone
(2008) - et al.
Clinical use of bone densitometry: scientific review
JAMA
(2002) - et al.
The diagnosis of osteoporosis
J Bone Miner Res
(1994) - et al.
Osteoporosis in men
Endocr Rev
(2008) - et al.
What are the criteria by which a densitometric diagnosis of osteoporosis can be made in males and non-Caucasians?
J Clin Densitom
(2002) - et al.
Osteoporosis in men and women: a story about bone mineral density thresholds and hip fracture risk
J Bone Miner Res
(2002) - et al.
Towards a diagnostic and therapeutic consensus in male osteoporosis
Osteoporos Int
(2011) - et al.
Using the same bone density reference database for men and women provides a simpler estimation of fracture risk
J Bone Miner Res
(2010)
Cited by (10)
Bone mass measurement
2018, Encyclopedia of Endocrine DiseasesDual-energy X-ray Absorptiometry
2017, Journal of Clinical DensitometryCitation Excerpt :Although some studies suggested that men may fracture at higher BMD than women (45), larger, population-based studies have indicated that the opposite may be true. For example, in the Canadian Multicentre Osteoporosis Study, 1887 men followed for mean 8.3 years had lower rates of any major osteoporotic fracture (RR 0.75, 95% CI 0.60–0.93) and low trauma fractures (RR 0.75, 0.61–0.92) when controlling for age and lumbar spine BMD compared with 4745 women (47). Although we will review the literature for some of the largest ethnic groups, it is important to note that variations may exist in certain subpopulations.
Value of Biochemical Indexes of Bone Metabolism in Predicting Osteoporotic Lumbar Fractures
2022, Applied Bionics and BiomechanicsDevelopment of a Nomogram for Predicting Very Low Bone Mineral Density (T-Scores <−3) in the Chinese Population
2022, International Journal of General MedicineWhere’s the break? Critique of radiographic vertebral fracture diagnostic methods
2021, Osteoporosis InternationalOsteoporosis in men: A review of an underestimated bone condition
2021, International Journal of Molecular Sciences