Top

14-06-2018 | Oligoarthritis | Article

Ultrasound-guided synovial biopsy improves diagnosis of septic arthritis in acute arthritis without enough analyzable synovial fluid: a retrospective analysis of 176 arthritis from a French rheumatology department

Journal: Clinical Rheumatology

Authors: Guillaume Coiffier, Marine Ferreyra, Jean-David Albert, Nathalie Stock, Anne Jolivet-Gougeon, Aleth Perdriger, Pascal Guggenbuhl

Publisher: Springer London

Abstract

To assess the diagnostic value of ultrasound-guided (US-guided) synovial biopsy in routine clinical practice in cases of acute and chronic arthritis. A retrospective, single-center study of US-guided synovial biopsies between 2003 and 2013. The clinical, laboratory, radiographic, synovial fluid, and histological and bacteriological results of synovial biopsies were analyzed. Arthritis was classified according to disease duration < 6 weeks (AA) or ≥ 6 weeks (CA). Synovial biopsy success rate was defined by the rate of capsular and/or synovial tissue analyzed. The diagnostic efficiency was defined by synovial biopsy success rate multiplied by the clinical utility (validation of a diagnostic hypothesis leading to a specific therapy). One hundred seventy-six US-guided synovial biopsies (51 AA and 125 CA) were analyzed. Synovial biopsy success rate was 82.4%. The diagnostic efficiency was 19.9%. Among the acute arthritis cases, 11 were septic. Only three patients had a positive biopsy culture while the synovial fluid puncture was of insufficient quantity to allow bacteriological analysis. The perivascular infiltration of neutrophils (PMN) had a sensitivity of 81.8%, a specificity of 84.2%, and a positive likelihood ratio of 5.2 for the septic arthritis diagnosis. Among the chronic arthritis cases, no case of pyogenic septic arthritis was found. No histological lesions, examined separately, were specific to a type of chronic inflammatory joint disease. US-guided synovial biopsies remain relevant for the diagnosis of septic arthritis, in cases of acute arthritis when joint aspiration is not possible.

Wiles NJ, Lunt M, Barrett EM, Bukhari M, Silman AJ, Symmons DP et al (2001) Reduced disability at five years with early treatment of inflammatory polyarthritis: results from a large observational cohort, using propensity models to adjust for disease severity. Arthritis Rheum 44(5):1033–1042CrossRefPubMed

Mathews CJ, Weston VC, Jones A, Field M, Coakley G (2010) Bacterial septic arthritis in adults. Lancet 375(9717):846–855CrossRefPubMed

Van Nies JA, Krabben A, Schoones JW, Huizinga TW, Kloppenburg M, van der Helm-van Mil AH (2014) What is the evidence for the presence of a therapeutic window of opportunity in rheumatoid arthritis? A systematic literature review. Ann Rheum Dis 73(5):861–870CrossRefPubMed

Weston VC, Jones AC, Bradbury N, Fawthrop F, Doherty M (1999) Clinical features and outcome of septic arthritis in a single UK Health District 1982-1991. Ann Rheum Dis 58(4):214–219CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Eberst-Ledoux J, Tournadre A, Mathieu S, Mrozek N, Dubost JJ (2012) Septic arthritis with negative bacteriological findings in adult native joints: a retrospective study of 74 cases. Joint Bone Spine 79(2):156–159CrossRefPubMed

Sivera F, Aragon R, Pascual E (2008) First metatarsophalangeal joint aspiration using a 29-gauge needle. Ann Rheum Dis 67(2):273–275CrossRefPubMed

Courtney P, Doherty M (2013) Joint aspiration and injection and synovial fluid analysis. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol 27(2):137–169CrossRefPubMed

Yu KH, Luo SF, Liou LB, Wu J, Tsai WP, Chen JY et al (2003) Concomitant septic and gouty arthritis-an analysis of 30 cases. Rheumatology (Oxford) 42(9):1062–1066CrossRef

Shah K, Spear J, Nathanson LA, McCauley J, Edlow JA (2007) Does the presence of crystal arthritis rule out septic arthritis? J Emerg Med 32(1):23–26CrossRefPubMed

10.

Bresnihan B (2003) Are synovial biopsies of diagnostic value? Arthritis Res Ther 5(6):271–278CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

11.

Scirè CA, Epis O, Codullo V, Humby F, Morbini P, Manzo A, Caporali R, Pitzalis C, Montecucco C (2007) Immunohistological assessment of the synovial tissue in small joints in rheumatoid arthritis: validation of a minimally invasive ultrasound-guided synovial biopsy procedure. Arthritis Res Ther 9(5):R101CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

12.

Koski JM, Helle M (2005) Ultrasound guided synovial biopsy using portal and forceps. Ann Rheum Dis 64(6):926–929CrossRefPubMed

13.

Singhal O, Kaur V, Kalhan S, Singhal MK, Gupta A, Machave Y (2012) Arthroscopic synovial biopsy in definitive diagnosis of joint diseases: an evaluation of efficacy and precision. Int J Appl Basic Med Res 2(2):102–106CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

14.

Kelly S, Humby F, Filer A, Ng N, Di Cicco M, Hands RE et al (2015) Ultrasound-guided synovial biopsy: a safe, well-tolerated and reliable technique for obtaining high-quality synovial tissue from both large and small joints in early arthritis patients. Ann Rheum Dis 74(3):611–617CrossRefPubMed

15.

Najm A, Orr C, Heymann MF, Bart G, Veale DJ, Le Goff B (2016) Success rate and utility of ultrasound-guided synovial biopsies in clinical practice. J Rheumatol 43(12):2113–2119CrossRefPubMed

16.

Sitt JC, Griffith JF, Lai FM, Hui M, Chiu KH, Lee RK et al (2017) Ultrasound-guided synovial Tru-cut biopsy: indications, technique, and outcome in 111 cases. Eur Radiol 27(5):2002–2010CrossRefPubMed

17.

Cross MC, Kransdorf MJ, Chivers FS, Lorans R, Roberts CC, Schwartz AJ, Beauchamp CP (2014) Utility of percutaneous joint aspiration and synovial biopsy in identifying culture-positive infected hip arthroplasty. Skelet Radiol 43(2):165–168CrossRef

18.

Fink B, Gebhard A, Fuerst M, Berger I, Schäfer P (2013) High diagnostic value of synovial biopsy in periprosthetic joint infection of the hip. Clin Orthop Relat Res 471(3):956–964CrossRefPubMed

19.

Fink B, Makowiak C, Fuerst M, Berger I, Schäfer P, Frommelt L (2008) The value of synovial biopsy, joint aspiration and C-reactive protein in the diagnosis of late peri-prosthetic infection of total knee replacements. J Bone Joint Surg Br 90(7):874–878CrossRefPubMed

20.

Kroot EJ, Weel AE, Hazes JM, Zondervan PE, Heijboer MP, van Daele PL et al (2006) Diagnostic value of blind synovial biopsy in clinical practice. Rheumatology (Oxford) 45(2):192–195CrossRef

21.

Jakobs M, Morawietz L, Rothschenk H, Hopf T, Weiner S, Schausten H, Krukemeyer MG, Krenn V (2007) Synovitis score: value of histopathological diagnostics in unclear arthritis. Case reports from rheumatological pathological practice. Z Rheumatol 66(8):706–712CrossRefPubMed

22.

Gibson T, Fagg N, Highton J, Wilton M, Dyson M (1985) The diagnostic value of synovial biopsy in patients with arthritis of unknown cause. Br J Rheumatol 24(3):232–241CrossRefPubMed

23.

Thevissen K, Vercoutere W, Bombardier C, Landewé RB (2011) Diagnostic and prognostic value of synovial biopsy in adult undifferentiated peripheral inflammatory arthritis: a systematic review. J Rheumatol Suppl 87:45–47CrossRefPubMed

24.

Marin F, Lasbleiz J, Albert JD, Askri A, Werner-Leyval S, Duval H, Duvauferrier R (2006) Synovial biopsy under US guidance: technical considerations and results. J Radiol 87(5):561–565CrossRefPubMed

25.

Hitchon CA, el-Gabalawy HS. (2003) The histopathology of early synovitis. Clin Exp Rheumatol 21(5 Suppl 31):S28–S36PubMed

26.

Wechalekar MD, Smith MD (2014) Utility of arthroscopic guided synovial biopsy in understanding synovial tissue pathology in health and disease states. World J Orthop 5(5):566–573CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

27.

Krenn V, Morawietz L, Burmester GR, Kinne RW, Mueller-Ladner U, Muller B, Haupl T (2006) Synovitis score: discrimination between chronic low-grade and high-grade synovitis. Histopathology 49(4):358–364CrossRefPubMed

28.

Krenn V, Morawietz L, Burmester GR, Häupl T (2005) Synovialitis score: histopathological grading system for chronic rheumatic and non-rheumatic synovialitis. Z Rheumatol 64(5):334–342CrossRefPubMed

29.

Gerlag D, Tak PP (2005) Synovial biopsy. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol 19(3):387–400CrossRefPubMed

30.

Meermans G, Haddad FS (2010) Is there a role for tissue biopsy in the diagnosis of periprosthetic infection? Clin Orthop Relat Res 468(5):1410–1417CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

31.

Goldenberg DL, Cohen AS (1978) Synovial membrane histopathology in the differential diagnosis of rheumatoid arthritis, gout, pseudogout, systemic lupus erythematosus, infectious arthritis and degenerative joint disease. Medicine (Baltimore) 57(3):239–252CrossRef

32.

Krenn V, Perino G, Rüther W, Krenn VT, Huber M, Hügle T, Najm A, Müller S, Boettner F, Pessler F, Waldstein W, Kriegsmann J, Casadonte R, Häupl T, Wienert S, Krukemeyer MG, Sesselmann S, Sunitsch S, Tikhilov R, Morawietz L (2017) 15 years of the histopathological synovitis score, further development and review: a diagnostic score for rheumatology and orthopaedics. Pathol Res Pract 213(8):874–881CrossRefPubMed

33.

Hair MJ, Harty LC, Gerlag DM, Pitzalis C, Veale DJ, Tak PP (2011) Synovial tissue analysis for the discovery of diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers in patients with early arthritis. J Rheumatol 38(9):2068–2072CrossRefPubMed

34.

Gerlag DM, Haringman JJ, Smeets TJ, Zwinderman AH, Kraan MC, Laud PJ et al (2004) Effects of oral prednisolone on biomarkers in synovial tissue and clinical improvement in rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum 50(12):3783–3791CrossRefPubMed

35.

Bresnihan B, Pontifex E, Thurlings RM, Vinkenoog M, El-Gabalawy H, Fearon U et al (2009) Synovial tissue sublining CD68 expression is a biomarker of therapeutic response in rheumatoid arthritis clinical trials: consistency across centers. J Rheumatol 36(8):1800–1802CrossRefPubMed

36.

Baeten D, Kruithof E, De Rycke L, Vandooren B, Wyns B, Boullart L et al (2004) Diagnostic classification of spondylarthropathy and rheumatoid arthritis by synovial histopathology: a prospective study in 154 consecutive patients. Arthritis Rheum 50(9):2931–2941CrossRefPubMed

37.

Coutinho M, Laranjo A, Casanova J (2012) Pigmented Villonodular Synovitis: a diagnostic challenge. Review of 28 cases. Acta Reumatol Port 37(4):335–341PubMed

38.

Taylor WJ, Fransen J, Dalbeth N, Neogi T, Ralph Schumacher H, Brown M, Louthrenoo W, Vazquez-Mellado J, Eliseev M, McCarthy G, Stamp LK, Perez-Ruiz F, Sivera F, Ea HK, Gerritsen M, Scire CA, Cavagna L, Lin C, Chou YY, Tausche AK, da Rocha Castelar-Pinheiro G, Janssen M, Chen JH, Slot O, Cimmino M, Uhlig T, Jansen TL (2016) Diagnostic arthrocentesis for suspicion of gout is safe and well tolerated. J Rheumatol 43(1):150–153CrossRefPubMed

Medicine Matters Rheumatology

Abstract