Skip to main content
Top

12-04-2017 | Osteoarthritis | Review | Article

Hip and Knee Arthroplasty in Osteoarthritis

Journal: Current Treatment Options in Rheumatology

Authors: Erik C. Zachwieja, MD, Jose Perez, BS, Michaela Schneiderbauer, MD MBA

Publisher: Springer International Publishing

Abstract

Osteoarthritis (OA) of the hip and knee continues to increase in prevalence with the increasing age of our population. This condition is characterized by joint pain, stiffness, and limitations in activities of daily living. Management options are initially aimed at preventing the progression of disease and delaying the need for total joint arthroplasty (TJA). This includes nonoperative measures, as well as surgical interventions, including arthroscopy, osteotomy, and arthrodesis. However, once patients fail alternative therapy, TJA is indicated. Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) and total hip arthroplasty (THA) are highly effective procedures at reducing pain and improving functional status. Patients report high satisfaction rates after TJA and experience minimal complications. Moreover, these procedures are cost effective. Significant research into patient-specific implants (PSI) and computer-navigation-assisted surgery shows improved component positioning; however, further research is needed to determine the clinical effect of this innovation. Wear rates in both TKA and THA have improved significantly over the past decade, with highly cross-linked ultra-high molecular-weight polyethylene showing promising results. New minimally invasive surgical techniques are also showing excellent short-term results, but long-term data is still lacking. Overall, hip and knee OA is a debilitating condition that can be effectively managed with TKA or THA. Indications continue to expand for these procedures and innovation continues to aim for improved outcomes.
Literature
1.
Martel-Pelletier J, Boileau C, Pelletier JP, Roughley PJ. Cartilage in normal and osteoarthritis conditions. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol. 2008;22(2):351–84.CrossRefPubMed
2.
Hutton CW. Osteoarthritis: the cause not result of joint failure? Ann Rheum Dis. 1989;48(11):958–61.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
3.
Mobasheri A, Batt M. An update on the pathophysiology of osteoarthritis. Ann Phys Rehabil Med. 2016.
4.
Oliveria SA, Felson DT, Reed JI, Cirillo PA, Walker AM. Incidence of symptomatic hand, hip, and knee osteoarthritis among patients in a health maintenance organization. Arthritis Rheum. 1995;38(8):1134–41.CrossRefPubMed
5.
Spector TD, Cicuttini F, Baker J, Loughlin J, Hart D. Genetic influences on osteoarthritis in women: a twin study. BMJ. 1996;312(7036):940–3.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
6.
Anderson JJ, Felson DT. Factors associated with osteoarthritis of the knee in the first national Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (HANES I). Evidence for an association with overweight, race, and physical demands of work. Am J Epidemiol. 1988;128(1):179–89.CrossRefPubMed
7.
Kujala UM, Kettunen J, Paananen H, Aalto T, Battie MC, Impivaara O, et al. Knee osteoarthritis in former runners, soccer players, weight lifters, and shooters. Arthritis Rheum. 1995;38(4):539–46.CrossRefPubMed
8.
Pisters MF, Veenhof C, van Dijk GM, Heymans MW, Twisk JW, Dekker J. The course of limitations in activities over 5 years in patients with knee and hip osteoarthritis with moderate functional limitations: risk factors for future functional decline. Osteoarthr Cartil. 2012;20(6):503–10.CrossRefPubMed
9.
Dunlop DD, Manheim LM, Song J, Chang RW. Arthritis prevalence and activity limitations in older adults. Arthritis Rheum. 2001;44(1):212–21.CrossRefPubMed
10.
Dawson J, Linsell L, Zondervan K, Rose P, Randall T, Carr A, et al. Epidemiology of hip and knee pain and its impact on overall health status in older adults. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2004;43(4):497–504.CrossRef
11.
• Cho HJ, Morey V, Kang JY, Kim KW, Kim TK. Prevalence and risk factors of spine, shoulder, hand, hip, and knee osteoarthritis in community-dwelling Koreans older than age 65 years. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2015;473(10):3307–14. A prognostic study of randomly selected Korean patients over the age of 65. They found the prevalence of and associations of demographic factors with radiographic OA among different joints.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
12.
Centers for Disease C, Prevention. Projected state-specific increases in self-reported doctor-diagnosed arthritis and arthritis-attributable activity limitations—United States, 2005–2030. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2007;56(17):423–5.
13.
Fortin PR, Penrod JR, Clarke AE, St-Pierre Y, Joseph L, Belisle P, et al. Timing of total joint replacement affects clinical outcomes among patients with osteoarthritis of the hip or knee. Arthritis Rheum. 2002;46(12):3327–30.CrossRefPubMed
14.
Lingard EA, Katz JN, Wright EA, Sledge CB, Kinemax OG. Predicting the outcome of total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2004;86-A(10):2179–86.CrossRefPubMed
15.
Owings MF, Kozak LJ. Ambulatory and inpatient procedures in the United States, 1996. Vital Health Stat. 1998;13(139):1–119.
16.
Kirkley A, Birmingham TB, Litchfield RB, Giffin JR, Willits KR, Wong CJ, et al. A randomized trial of arthroscopic surgery for osteoarthritis of the knee. N Engl J Med. 2008;359(11):1097–107.CrossRefPubMed
17.
Moseley JB, O'Malley K, Petersen NJ, Menke TJ, Brody BA, Kuykendall DH, et al. A controlled trial of arthroscopic surgery for osteoarthritis of the knee. N Engl J Med. 2002;347(2):81–8.CrossRefPubMed
18.
Bedard NA, Pugely AJ, Duchman KR, Westermann RW, Gao Y, Callaghan JJ. When hip scopes fail, they do so quickly. J Arthroplast. 2016;31(6):1183–7.CrossRef
19.
Chandrasekaran S, Darwish N, Gui C, Lodhia P, Suarez-Ahedo C, Domb BG. Outcomes of hip arthroscopy in patients with Tonnis Grade-2 osteoarthritis at a mean 2-year follow-up: evaluation using a matched-pair analysis with Tonnis Grade-0 and Grade-1 cohorts. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2016;98(12):973–82.CrossRefPubMed
20.
• Schairer WW, Nwachukwu BU, McCormick F, Lyman S, Mayman D. Use of hip arthroscopy and risk of conversion to total hip arthroplasty: a population-based analysis. Arthroscopy. 2016;32(4):587–93. A retrospective comparative study investigating evaluating the conversion rate of THA within 2 years of hip arthroscopy and assess the influence of age, arthritis, and obesity on the rate of conversion to THA. Hip arthroscopy is performed in patients of various ages and older patients have a higher rate of conversion to THA, as do patients with osteoarthritis or obesity.CrossRefPubMed
21.
•• Piuzzi NS, Slullitel PA, Bertona A, Onativia IJ, Albergo I, Zanotti G, et al. Hip arthroscopy in osteoarthritis: a systematic review of the literature. Hip Int. 2016;26(1):8–14. A systematic review of patients with hip OA treated with arthroscopy that found the overall conversion rate to THA ranged from 9.5 to 50% with a mean time between arthroscopy and THA of 13.5 months.CrossRefPubMed
22.
Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. Healthcare cost and utilization project. Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. 2010.
23.
W-sDahl A, Robertsson O, Lidgren L. Surgery for knee osteoarthritis in younger patients. Acta Orthop. 2010;81(2):161–4.CrossRef
24.
Virolainen P, Aro HT. High tibial osteotomy for the treatment of osteoarthritis of the knee: a review of the literature and a meta-analysis of follow-up studies. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2004;124(4):258–61.CrossRefPubMed
25.
Ito H, Matsuno T, Minami A. Chiari pelvic osteotomy for advanced osteoarthritis in patients with hip dysplasia. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2005;87(Suppl 1(Pt 2)):213–25.CrossRefPubMed
26.
Steppacher SD, Tannast M, Ganz R, Siebenrock KA. Mean 20-year followup of Bernese periacetabular osteotomy. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2008;466(7):1633–44.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
27.
Schramm M, Hohmann D, Radespiel-Troger M, Pitto RP. Treatment of the dysplastic acetabulum with Wagner spherical osteotomy. A study of patients followed for a minimum of twenty years. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2003;85-A(5):808–14.CrossRefPubMed
28.
Chen M, Shang XF. Surgical treatment for young adult hip dysplasia: joint-preserving options. Int Orthop. 2016;40(5):891–900.CrossRefPubMed
29.
Somayaji HS, Tsaggerides P, Ware HE, Dowd GS. Knee arthrodesis—a review. Knee. 2008;15(4):247–54.CrossRefPubMed
30.
Conway JD, Mont MA, Bezwada HP. Arthrodesis of the knee. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2004;86-A(4):835–48.CrossRefPubMed
31.
Gottfriedsen TB, Schroder HM, Odgaard A. Knee arthrodesis after failure of knee arthroplasty: a nationwide register-based study. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2016;98(16):1370–7.CrossRefPubMed
32.
Carr 2nd JB, Werner BC, Browne JA. Trends and outcomes in the treatment of failed septic total knee arthroplasty: comparing arthrodesis and above-knee amputation. J Arthroplast. 2016;31(7):1574–7.CrossRef
33.
• Kernkamp WA, Verra WC, Pijls BG, Schoones JW, van der Linden HM, Nelissen RG. Conversion from knee arthrodesis to arthroplasty: systematic review. Int Orthop. 2016;40(10):2069–74. A systemic review of conversion of an arthrodesis to TKA and found good clinical results can be expected after conversion, albeit at a high risk of postoperative complications.CrossRefPubMed
34.
Stover MD, Beaule PE, Matta JM, Mast JW. Hip arthrodesis: a procedure for the new millennium? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2004;418:126–33.CrossRef
35.
•• Jain S, Giannoudis PV. Arthrodesis of the hip and conversion to total hip arthroplasty: a systematic review. J Arthroplast. 2013;28(9):1596–602. A systemic review investigating outcomes in arthrodesis of the hip and subsequent conversion to total hip arthroplasty. They found complications in up to 54% of cases, most commonly due to mechanical failure, deep infection, and nerve palsy.CrossRef
36.
Sirikonda SP, Beardmore SP, Hodgkinson JP. Role of hip arthrodesis in current practice: long term results following conversion to total hip arthroplasty. Hip Int. 2008;18(4):263–71.CrossRefPubMed
37.
•• Maradit Kremers H, Larson DR, Crowson CS, Kremers WK, Washington RE, Steiner CA, et al. Prevalence of total hip and knee replacement in the United States. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2015;97(17):1386–97. A retrospective study using national databases in which the prevalence of total hip and total knee replacements in the USA was estimated to be around 7 million, which, in most cases, are mobile, despite advanced arthritis.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
38.
Kurtz S, Ong K, Lau E, Mowat F, Halpern M. Projections of primary and revision hip and knee arthroplasty in the United States from 2005 to 2030. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007;89(4):780–5.PubMed
39.
Feeley BT, Gallo RA, Sherman S, Williams RJ. Management of osteoarthritis of the knee in the active patient. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2010;18(7):406–16.CrossRefPubMed
40.
Zhang W, Moskowitz RW, Nuki G, Abramson S, Altman RD, Arden N, et al. OARSI recommendations for the management of hip and knee osteoarthritis, part II: OARSI evidence-based, expert consensus guidelines. Osteoarthr Cartil. 2008;16(2):137–62.CrossRefPubMed
41.
Aarons H, Hall G, Hughes S, Salmon P. Short-term recovery from hip and knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1996;78(4):555–8.PubMed
42.
Shih LY, Chen TH, Lo WH, Yang DJ. Total hip arthroplasty in patients with ankylosing spondylitis: longterm followup. J Rheumatol. 1995;22(9):1704–9.PubMed
43.
Crawford RW, Murray DW. Total hip replacement: indications for surgery and risk factors for failure. Ann Rheum Dis. 1997;56(8):455–7.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
44.
• Van Manen MD, Nace J, Mont MA. Management of primary knee osteoarthritis and indications for total knee arthroplasty for general practitioners. J Am Osteopath Assoc. 2012;112(11):709–15. A review discussing nonoperative treatment options for patients with OA, operative treatment options to be considered before TKA, and indications for TKA when other treatment options have been exhausted.PubMed
45.
• Jamsen E, Eskelinen A, Peltola M, Makela K. High early failure rate after cementless hip replacement in the octogenarian. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2014;472(9):2779–89. A therapeutic study investigating how different fixation methods (cemented, cementless, hybrid) affect the survival of primary hip replacements and mortality in patients 80 years or older. Found cementless fixation was associated with an increased risk of revision and did not provide any benefit in terms of lower mortality in octogenarian patients.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
46.
Vorhies JS, Wang Y, Herndon J, Maloney WJ, Huddleston JI. Readmission and length of stay after total hip arthroplasty in a national Medicare sample. J Arthroplast. 2011;26(6 Suppl):119–23.CrossRef
47.
•• Kehlet H. Fast-track hip and knee arthroplasty. Lancet. 2013;381(9878):1600–2. A review of fast-track hip and knee arthroplasty discussing specifically management, complications, and principles of fast-track arthroplasty.CrossRefPubMed
48.
Berger RA, Jacobs JJ, Meneghini RM, Della Valle C, Paprosky W, Rosenberg AG. Rapid rehabilitation and recovery with minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2004;429:239–47.CrossRef
49.
Callaghan JJ, Albright JC, Goetz DD, Olejniczak JP, Johnston RC. Charnley total hip arthroplasty with cement. Minimum twenty-five-year follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2000;82(4):487–97.CrossRefPubMed
50.
Abdel MP, Morrey ME, Jensen MR, Morrey BF. Increased long-term survival of posterior cruciate-retaining versus posterior cruciate-stabilizing total knee replacements. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2011;93(22):2072–8.CrossRefPubMed
51.
• Lalmohamed A, Vestergaard P, de Boer A, Leufkens HG, van Staa TP, de Vries F. Changes in mortality patterns following total hip or knee arthroplasty over the past two decades: a nationwide cohort study. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2014;66(2):311–8. A retrospective cohort study of Danish patients evaluating the mortality patterns in patients undergoing elective THA and TKA. They found mortality rates following elective THA and TKA have decreased substantially since the early 1990s, despite patients having more presurgical comorbidity.CrossRefPubMed
52.
•• Skou ST, Roos EM, Laursen MB. A randomized, controlled trial of total knee replacement. N Engl J Med. 2016;374(7):692. A randomized, controlled trial of patients with moderate-to-severe knee osteoarthritis treated with total knee replacement followed by 12 weeks of nonsurgical treatment or treatment with only the 12 weeks of nonsurgical treatment. They found treatment with total knee replacement followed by nonsurgical treatment resulted in greater pain relief and functional improvement.CrossRefPubMed
53.
Bourne RB, Chesworth BM, Davis AM, Mahomed NN, Charron KD. Patient satisfaction after total knee arthroplasty: who is satisfied and who is not? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2010;468(1):57–63.CrossRefPubMed
54.
Learmonth ID, Young C, Rorabeck C. The operation of the century: total hip replacement. Lancet. 2007;370(9597):1508–19.CrossRefPubMed
55.
Baker PN, van der Meulen JH, Lewsey J, Gregg PJ. National Joint Registry for E, Wales. The role of pain and function in determining patient satisfaction after total knee replacement. Data from the National Joint Registry for England and Wales. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2007;89(7):893–900.CrossRefPubMed
56.
Rolfson O, Dahlberg LE, Nilsson JA, Malchau H, Garellick G. Variables determining outcome in total hip replacement surgery. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2009;91(2):157–61.CrossRefPubMed
57.
Buirs LD, Van Beers LW, Scholtes VA, Pastoors T, Sprague S, Poolman RW. Predictors of physical functioning after total hip arthroplasty: a systematic review. BMJ Open. 2016;6(9):e010725.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
58.
Katz JN, Losina E, Barrett J, Phillips CB, Mahomed NN, Lew RA, et al. Association between hospital and surgeon procedure volume and outcomes of total hip replacement in the United States Medicare population. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2001;83-A(11):1622–9.CrossRefPubMed
59.
• Pugely AJ, Callaghan JJ, Martin CT, Cram P, Gao Y. Incidence of and risk factors for 30-day readmission following elective primary total joint arthroplasty: analysis from the ACS-NSQIP. J Arthroplast. 2013;28(9):1499–504. A retrospective study of government data, studying the 30-day readmission rates and complications after elective primary TKA and THA. They found overall readmission rates within 30 days of surgery were 4.6% for TKA and 4.2% for THA.CrossRef
60.
Schairer WW, Sing DC, Vail TP, Bozic KJ. Causes and frequency of unplanned hospital readmission after total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2014;472(2):464–70.CrossRefPubMed
61.
•• Sibia US, Mandelblatt AE, Callanan MA, MacDonald JH, King PJ. Incidence, risk factors, and costs for hospital returns after total joint arthroplasties. J Arthroplasty. 2016. A retrospective study examining the incidence, risk factors, and costs for unplanned emergency department (ED) visits and readmissions within 30 days of index TJA. Unplanned ED visits and readmissions in the forthcoming bundled payments reimbursement model will reduce cost savings from rapid recovery protocols for TJA.
62.
Zmistowski B, Restrepo C, Hess J, Adibi D, Cangoz S, Parvizi J. Unplanned readmission after total joint arthroplasty: rates, reasons, and risk factors. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2013;95(20):1869–76.CrossRefPubMed
63.
• Paxton EW, Inacio MC, Singh JA, Love R, Bini SA, Namba RS. Are there modifiable risk factors for hospital readmission after total hip arthroplasty in a US Healthcare system? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2015;473(11):3446–55. A retrospective study examining the incidence of hospital readmissions after primary THA and the reasons and risk factors for readmission. Thirty-day hospital readmission rate after primary THA was 3.6%, and modifiable factors have the potential to be addressed by improving the health of patients before this elective procedure.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
64.
Sharkey PF, Lichstein PM, Shen C, Tokarski AT, Parvizi J. Why are total knee arthroplasties failing today—has anything changed after 10 years? J Arthroplast. 2014;29(9):1774–8.CrossRef
65.
• Capon-Garcia D, Lopez-Pardo A, Alves-Perez MT. Causes for revision surgery in total hip replacement. A retrospective epidemiological analysis. Rev Esp Cir Ortop Traumatol. 2016;60(3):160–6. A retrospective epidimiological study examining the impact of revision surgery in total hip arthroplasty and analyzing the relationship between the causes of revision with different variables.PubMed
66.
Iamthanaporn K, Chareancholvanich K, Pornrattanamaneewong C. Revision primary total hip replacement: causes and risk factors. J Med Assoc Thail. 2015;98(1):93–9.
67.
Browne JA, Bechtold CD, Berry DJ, Hanssen AD, Lewallen DG. Failed metal-on-metal hip arthroplasties: a spectrum of clinical presentations and operative findings. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2010;468(9):2313–20.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
68.
Rahman WA, Amenabar T, Hetaimish BM, Safir OA, Kuzyk PR, Gross AE. Outcome of revision total hip arthroplasty in management of failed metal-on-metal hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplast. 2016;31(11):2559–63.CrossRef
69.
Katz JN. Total joint replacement in osteoarthritis. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol. 2006;20(1):145–53.CrossRefPubMed
70.
Elmallah RK, Chughtai M, Khlopas A, Bhowmik-Stoker M, Bozic KJ, Kurtz SM, et al. Determining cost-effectiveness of total hip and knee arthroplasty using the Short Form-6D utility measure. J Arthroplasty. 2016.
71.
Schilling CG, Dowsey MM, Petrie DJ, Clarke PM, Choong PF. Predicting the long-term gains in health-related quality of life after total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2016.
72.
Anderl W, Pauzenberger L, Kolblinger R, Kiesselbach G, Brandl G, Laky B, et al. Patient-specific instrumentation improved mechanical alignment, while early clinical outcome was comparable to conventional instrumentation in TKA. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2016;24(1):102–11.CrossRefPubMed
73.
Abdel MP, Parratte S, Blanc G, Ollivier M, Pomero V, Viehweger E, et al. No benefit of patient-specific instrumentation in TKA on functional and gait outcomes: a randomized clinical trial. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2014;472(8):2468–76.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
74.
• Sassoon A, Nam D, Nunley R, Barrack R. Systematic review of patient-specific instrumentation in total knee arthroplasty: new but not improved. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2015;473(1):151–8. A systematic review looking at patient-specific cutting blocks and instrumentation compared to conventional methods and found PSI for TKA have not reliably demonstrated improvement of postoperative limb or component alignment when compared with standard instrumentation. PSI have not clearly been shown to improve overall surgical efficiency or the cost-effectiveness of TKA.CrossRefPubMed
75.
Parratte S, Blanc G, Boussemart T, Ollivier M, Le Corroller T, Argenson JN. Rotation in total knee arthroplasty: no difference between patient-specific and conventional instrumentation. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2013;21(10):2213–9.CrossRefPubMed
76.
Small T, Krebs V, Molloy R, Bryan J, Klika AK, Barsoum WK. Comparison of acetabular shell position using patient specific instruments vs. standard surgical instruments: a randomized clinical trial. J Arthroplast. 2014;29(5):1030–7.CrossRef
77.
Buller L, Smith T, Bryan J, Klika A, Barsoum W, Iannotti JP. The use of patient-specific instrumentation improves the accuracy of acetabular component placement. J Arthroplast. 2013;28(4):631–6.CrossRef
78.
Delp SL, Stulberg SD, Davies B, Picard F, Leitner F. Computer assisted knee replacement. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1998;354:49–56.CrossRef
79.
Burnett RS, Barrack RL. Computer-assisted total knee arthroplasty is currently of no proven clinical benefit: a systematic review. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2013;471(1):264–76.CrossRefPubMed
80.
Suksathien Y, Suksathien R, Chaiwirattana P. Acetabular cup placement in navigated and non-navigated total hip arthroplasty (THA): results of two consecutive series using a cementless short stem. J Med Assoc Thail. 2014;97(6):629–34.
81.
D'Antonio JA, Manley MT, Capello WN, Bierbaum BE, Ramakrishnan R, Naughton M, et al. Five-year experience with crossfire highly cross-linked polyethylene. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2005;441:143–50.CrossRefPubMed
82.
Kurtz SM, Gawel HA, Patel JD. History and systematic review of wear and osteolysis outcomes for first-generation highly crosslinked polyethylene. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2011;469(8):2262–77.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
83.
Sentuerk U, von Roth P, Perka C. Ceramic on ceramic arthroplasty of the hip: new materials confirm appropriate use in young patients. Bone Joint J. 2016;98-B(1 Suppl A):14–7.CrossRefPubMed
84.
• Moskal JT, Capps SG. Is limited incision better than standard total hip arthroplasty? A meta-analysis. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2013;471(4):1283–94. A meta-analysis comparing limited incision THA to standard incision THA; and to determine whether limited incision THA is an improvement over standard incision THA and found short-term recovery favors limited incision over standard incision THA.CrossRefPubMed
85.
Pan WM, Li XG, Tang TS, Qian ZL, Zhang Q, Zhang CM. Mini-subvastus versus a standard approach in total knee arthroplasty: a prospective, randomized, controlled study. J Int Med Res. 2010;38(3):890–900.CrossRefPubMed
86.
Karachalios T, Giotikas D, Roidis N, Poultsides L, Bargiotas K, Malizos KN. Total knee replacement performed with either a mini-midvastus or a standard approach: a prospective randomised clinical and radiological trial. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2008;90(5):584–91.CrossRefPubMed
87.
Walker T, Streit MR, Streit J, Gotterbarm T, Aldinger PR. Indications and borderline indications for medial mobile bearing unicondylar knee replacement. Z Orthop Unfall. 2015;153(5):516–25.CrossRefPubMed
88.
Duthon VB, Miozzari H. Unicompartmental knee replacement. Rev Med Suisse. 2013;9(411):2380–4.PubMed
89.
Hube R, Keim M. Minimally invasive implantation in unicondylar arthroplasty. Orthopade. 2007;36(12):1093–9.CrossRefPubMed
90.
Khan Z, Nawaz SZ, Kahane S, Esler C, Chatterji U. Conversion of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty to total knee arthroplasty: the challenges and need for augments. Acta Orthop Belg. 2013;79(6):699–705.PubMed
91.
Lisowski LA, van den Bekerom MP, Pilot P, van Dijk CN, Lisowski AE. Oxford phase 3 unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: medium-term results of a minimally invasive surgical procedure. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2011;19(2):277–84.CrossRefPubMed
92.
Manzotti A, Cerveri P, Pullen C, Confalonieri N. A flat all-polyethylene tibial component in medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: a long-term study. Knee. 2014;21(Suppl 1):S20–5.CrossRefPubMed
93.
Zuiderbaan HA, Khamaisy S, Thein R, Nawabi DH, Pearle AD. Congruence and joint space width alterations of the medial compartment following lateral unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. Bone Joint J. 2015;97-b(1):50–5.CrossRefPubMed
94.
• Walker T, Gotterbarm T, Bruckner T, Merle C, Streit MR. Return to sports, recreational activity and patient-reported outcomes after lateral unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2015;23(11):3281–7. A retrospective case series investigating the activity level and the health-related quality of life of patients following lateral UKA and reported a vast majority (98%) of patients returned to sports and recreational activity after lateral UKA. Two thirds of the patients reached a high activity level.CrossRefPubMed
95.
•• Kim KT, Lee S, Lee JI, Kim JW. Analysis and treatment of complications after unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. Knee Surg Relat Res. 2016;28(1):46–54. A retrospective study looking at causes and types of complications after UKA: found the most common complication after UKA was dislocation of the mobile bearing.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
96.
Ji JH, Park SE, Song IS, Kang H, Ha JY, Jeong JJ. Complications of medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Surg. 2014;6(4):365–72.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
97.
Labruyere C, Zeller V, Lhotellier L, Desplaces N, Leonard P, Mamoudy P, et al. Chronic infection of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: one-stage conversion to total knee arthroplasty. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2015;101(5):553–7.CrossRefPubMed
98.
Baker PN, Jameson SS, Deehan DJ, Gregg PJ, Porter M, Tucker K. Mid-term equivalent survival of medial and lateral unicondylar knee replacement: an analysis of data from a National Joint Registry. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2012;94(12):1641–8.CrossRefPubMed
99.
Mallen TA, Diaz-Borjon E, Makdissy-Salomon GJ, Montejo-Vargas J, Marcial-Barba LD. Medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty with a phase 3 Oxford prosthesis. Results with a 2 to 11 year follow-up. Acta ortopedica mexicana. 2014;28(3):153–9.PubMed