Skip to main content
Top

27-07-2018 | Rheumatoid arthritis | Article

A randomized controlled trial comparing PF-06438179/GP1111 (an infliximab biosimilar) and infliximab reference product for treatment of moderate to severe active rheumatoid arthritis despite methotrexate therapy

Journal: Arthritis Research & Therapy

Authors: Stanley B. Cohen, Rieke Alten, Hideto Kameda, Tomas Hala, Sebastiao C. Radominski, Muhammad I. Rehman, Ramesh Palaparthy, Karl Schumacher, Susanne Schmitt, Steven Y. Hua, Claudia Ianos, K. Lea Sewell

Publisher: BioMed Central

Abstract

Background

This double-blind, active-controlled, randomized, multinational study evaluated the efficacy, safety, pharmacokinetics (PK), and immunogenicity of PF-06438179/GP1111 (IxifiTM/Zessly®), an infliximab biosimilar, vs infliximab (Remicade®) reference product sourced from the European Union (infliximab-EU) in biologic-naïve patients with moderate to severe active rheumatoid arthritis (RA) despite methotrexate therapy. This paper reports results from the initial 30-week treatment period.

Methods

Patients (N = 650) were stratified by geographic region and randomized 1:1 to PF-06438179/GP1111 or infliximab-EU (3 mg/kg intravenous at weeks 0, 2, and 6, then every 8 weeks). Dose escalation to 5 mg/kg was allowed starting at week 14 for patients with inadequate RA response. The primary endpoint was American College of Rheumatology criteria for ≥ 20% clinical improvement (ACR20) response at week 14. Therapeutic equivalence was declared if the two-sided 95% CI for the treatment difference was within the symmetric equivalence margin of ± 13.5%. Statistical analysis was also performed with a two-sided 90% CI using an asymmetric equivalence margin (− 12.0%, 15.0%).

Results

Patients (80.3% female; 79.4% seropositive) had a mean RA duration of 6.9 years, and mean baseline Disease Activity Score in 28 joints, four components based on C-reactive protein was 6.0 in both arms. Week 14 ACR20 in the intention-to-treat population was 62.7% for PF-06438179/GP1111 and 64.1% for infliximab-EU. Week 14 ACR20 using nonresponder imputation was 61.1% for PF-06438179/GP1111 and 63.5% for infliximab-EU, and the 95% (− 9.92%, 5.11%) and 90% (− 8.75%, 4.02%) CIs for the treatment difference (− 2.39%) were entirely contained within the prespecified symmetric and asymmetric equivalence margins, respectively. No differences were observed between arms for secondary efficacy endpoints. Overall postdose antidrug antibody (ADA) rates through week 30 were 48.6% and 51.2% for PF-06438179/GP1111 and infliximab-EU, respectively. Efficacy and immunogenicity were similar between treatments for patients with dose escalation (at or after week 14), as well as between treatments for patients without dose escalation. Safety profiles of PF-06438179/GP1111 and infliximab-EU were similar, with no clinically meaningful differences observed between arms, including after ADA development. Serum drug concentrations were similar between arms at each time point during the initial 30-week treatment period.

Conclusion

PF-06438179/GP1111 and infliximab-EU demonstrated similar efficacy, safety, immunogenicity, and PK with or without dose escalation in patients with moderate to severe active RA on background methotrexate.

Trial registration

ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02222493. Registered on 21 August 2014.
EudraCT, 2013-004148-49. Registered on 14 July 2014.
Literature
1.
European Medicines Agency (EMA). Remicade (infliximab) summary of product characteristics. London: EMA; 2017. http://​www.​ema.​europa.​eu/​docs/​en_​GB/​document_​library/​EPAR_​-_​Product_​Information/​human/​000240/​WC500050888.​pdf. Accessed 14 Aug 2017.
2.
Janssen Biotech Inc. Remicade (infliximab) US prescribing information. Horsham, PA: Janssen Biotech, Inc.; 2017. https://​www.​accessdata.​fda.​gov/​drugsatfda_​docs/​label/​2017/​761072s000lbl.​pdf. Accessed 14 Aug 2017.
3.
Lipsky PE, van der Heijde DM, St Clair EW, Furst DE, Breedveld FC, Kalden JR, et al. Infliximab and methotrexate in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis: anti-tumor necrosis factor trial in rheumatoid arthritis with concomitant therapy study group. N Engl J Med. 2000;343:1594–602.CrossRefPubMed
4.
St Clair EW, van der Heijde DM, Smolen JS, Maini RN, Bathon JM, Emery P, et al. Combination of infliximab and methotrexate therapy for early rheumatoid arthritis: a randomized, controlled trial. Arthritis Rheum. 2004;50:3432–43.CrossRefPubMed
5.
Kalo Z, Voko Z, Ostor A, Clifton-Brown E, Vasilescu R, Battersby A, et al. Patient access to reimbursed biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs in the European region. J Mark Access Health Policy. 2017;5:1345580.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
6.
Cifaldi M, Renaud J, Ganguli A, Halpern MT. Disparities in care by insurance status for individuals with rheumatoid arthritis: analysis of the medical expenditure panel survey, 2006-2009. Curr Med Res Opin. 2016;32:2029–37.CrossRefPubMed
7.
Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use (CHMP), European Medicines Agency (EMA). Guideline on similar biological medicinal products. London: EMA; 2014. http://​www.​ema.​europa.​eu/​docs/​en_​GB/​document_​library/​Scientific_​guideline/​2014/​10/​WC500176768.​pdf. Accessed 14 Aug 2017.
8.
US Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Scientific considerations in demonstrating biosimilarity to a reference product. Guidance for industry. Silver Spring, MD: FDA; 2015. http://​www.​fda.​gov/​downloads/​Drugs/​GuidanceComplian​ceRegulatoryInfo​rmation/​Guidances/​UCM291128.​pdf. Accessed 14 Aug 2017.
9.
IMS Institute for Healthcare Informatics. Delivering on the potential of biosimilar medicines: the role of functioning competitive markets. Parsippany, NJ: IMS Health and the IMS Institute for Healthcare Informatics; March 2016. https://​www.​medicinesforeuro​pe.​com/​wp-content/​uploads/​2016/​03/​IMS-Institute-Biosimilar-Report-March-2016-FINAL.​pdf. Accessed 21 Aug 2017.
10.
Jha A, Upton A, Dunlop WC, Akehurst R. The budget impact of biosimilar infliximab (Remsima®) for the treatment of autoimmune diseases in five European countries. Adv Ther. 2015;32:742–56.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
11.
Singh SC, Bagnato KM. The economic implications of biosimilars. Am J Manag Care. 2015;21(16 Suppl):s331–40.
12.
Jorgensen KK, Olsen IC, Goll GL, Lorentzen M, Bolstad N, Haavardsholm EA, et al. Switching from originator infliximab to biosimilar CT-P13 compared with maintained treatment with originator infliximab (NOR-SWITCH): a 52-week, randomised, double-blind, non-inferiority trial. Lancet. 2017;389:2304–16.CrossRefPubMed
13.
Pfizer Inc. Ixifi (infliximab-qbtx) US prescribing information. Pfizer Inc. 2017. https://​www.​accessdata.​fda.​gov/​drugsatfda_​docs/​label/​2017/​761072s000lbl.​pdf. Accessed 2 July 2018.
14.
European Medicines Agency. Zessly (infliximab) summary of product characteristics. 2018. http://​www.​ema.​europa.​eu/​docs/​en_​GB/​document_​library/​EPAR_​-_​Product_​Information/​human/​004647/​WC500249647.​pdf. Accessed 2 July 2018.
15.
Derzi M, Johnson TR, Shoieb AM, Conlon HD, Sharpe P, Saati A, et al. Nonclinical evaluation of PF-06438179: a potential biosimilar to Remicade® (infliximab). Adv Ther. 2016;33:1964–82.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
16.
Palaparthy R, Udata C, Hua SY, Yin D, Cai CH, Salts S, et al. A randomized study comparing the pharmacokinetics of the potential biosimilar PF-06438179/GP1111 with Remicade® (infliximab) in healthy subjects (REFLECTIONS B537-01). Expert Rev Clin Immunol. 2018;14:329–36.CrossRefPubMed
17.
Aletaha D, Neogi T, Silman AJ, Funovits J, Felson DT, Bingham CO 3rd, et al. 2010 rheumatoid arthritis classification criteria: an American College of Rheumatology/European League Against Rheumatism collaborative initiative. Ann Rheum Dis. 2010;69:1580–8.CrossRefPubMed
18.
Hochberg MC, Chang RW, Dwosh I, Lindsey S, Pincus T, Wolfe F. The American College of Rheumatology 1991 revised criteria for the classification of global functional status in rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum. 1992;35:498–502.CrossRefPubMed
19.
ClinicalTrials.gov. A study of PF-06438179 (infliximab-Pfizer) and infliximab in combination with methotrexate in subjects with active rheumatoid arthritis (REFLECTIONS B537–02). Registered on 21 Aug 2014. https://​clinicaltrials.​gov/​ct2/​show/​NCT02222493. Accessed 14 Aug 2017.
20.
US Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Guidance for industry. Rheumatoid arthritis: developing drug products for treatment. Rockville, MD: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, FDA, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research (CDER); 2013. https://​www.​fda.​gov/​downloads/​drugs/​guidancecomplian​ceregulatoryinfo​rmation/​guidances/​ucm354468.​pdf. Accessed 22 Aug 2017.
21.
Abe T, Takeuchi T, Miyasaka N, Hashimoto H, Kondo H, Ichikawa Y, et al. A multicenter, double-blind, randomized, placebo controlled trial of infliximab combined with low dose methotrexate in Japanese patients with rheumatoid arthritis. J Rheumatol. 2006;33:37–44.PubMed
22.
Maini R, St Clair EW, Breedveld F, Furst D, Kalden J, Weisman M, et al. Infliximab (chimeric anti-tumour necrosis factor α monoclonal antibody) versus placebo in rheumatoid arthritis patients receiving concomitant methotrexate: a randomised phase III trial. ATTRACT study group. Lancet. 1999;354:1932–9.CrossRefPubMed
23.
Schiff M, Keiserman M, Codding C, Songcharoen S, Berman A, Nayiager S, et al. Efficacy and safety of abatacept or infliximab vs placebo in ATTEST: a phase III, multi-centre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled study in patients with rheumatoid arthritis and an inadequate response to methotrexate. Ann Rheum Dis. 2008;67:1096–103.CrossRefPubMed
24.
Westhovens R, Yocum D, Han J, Berman A, Strusberg I, Geusens P, et al. The safety of infliximab, combined with background treatments, among patients with rheumatoid arthritis and various comorbidities: a large, randomized, placebo-controlled trial. Arthritis Rheum. 2006;54:1075–86.CrossRefPubMed
25.
Zhang F-C, Hou Y, Huang F, Wu D-H, Bao C-D, Ni L-Q, et al. Infliximab versus placebo in rheumatoid arthritis patients receiving concomitant methotrexate: a preliminary study from China. APLAR J Rheumatol. 2006;9:127–30.CrossRef
26.
Hua SY, Xu S, Barker KB, Liao SM, Li S. Bayesian methods to assess bioequivalence and biosimilarity with case studies. In: Barker KB, Menon SM, D’ Agostino RB, Xu S, Jin B, editors. Biosimilar clinical development: scientific considerations and new methodologies. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press; 2017. p. 181–98.
27.
Alten R, van den Bosch F. Dose optimization of infliximab in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Int J Rheum Dis. 2014;17:5–18.CrossRefPubMed
28.
Ariza-Ariza R, Navarro-Sarabia F, Hernandez-Cruz B, Rodriguez-Arboleya L, Navarro-Compan V, Toyos J. Dose escalation of the anti-TNF-α agents in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a systematic review. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2007;46:529–32.CrossRef
29.
Wu E, Chen L, Birnbaum H, Yang E, Cifaldi M. Retrospective claims data analysis of dosage adjustment patterns of TNF antagonists among patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Curr Med Res Opin. 2008;24:2229–40.CrossRefPubMed
30.
Lee H. Is extrapolation of the safety and efficacy data in one indication to another appropriate for biosimilars? AAPS J. 2014;16:22–6.CrossRefPubMed