Top

08-02-2017 | Rheumatoid arthritis | Article

Clinical Examination, Ultrasound and MRI Imaging of The Painful Elbow in Psoriatic Arthritis and Rheumatoid Arthritis: Which is Better, Ultrasound or MR, for Imaging Enthesitis?

Journal: Rheumatology and Therapy

Authors: Clare Groves, Muthusamy Chandramohan, Ne Siang Chew, Tariq Aslam, Philip S. Helliwell

Publisher: Springer Healthcare

Abstract

Introduction

The purpose of the current study was to examine the painful elbow, and in particular enthesitis, in psoriatic arthritis (PsA) and rheumatoid arthritis (RA) using clinical examination, ultrasonography (US) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).

Methods

Patients with elbow pain (11 with PsA and 9 with RA) were recruited. Clinical examination, US and MRI studies were performed on the same day. For enthesitis, the common extensor and flexor insertions and the triceps insertion were imaged (20 patients, giving a total of 60 sites with comparative data). Imaging was performed with the radiologists blinded to the diagnosis and clinical findings. US was used to assess ‘inflammatory activity’ (Power Doppler signal, oedema, tendon thickening and bursal swelling) and ‘damage’ (erosions, cortical roughening and enthesophytes). MRI was used to assess ‘inflammation’ (fluid in paratenon, peri-entheseal soft-tissue oedema, entheseal enhancement with gadolinium, entheseal oedema and bone oedema) and ‘damage’ (erosion, cortical roughening and enthesophyte).

Results

Complete scan data were not available for all patients as one patient could not tolerate the MRI examination. No significant differences in imaging scores were found between PsA and RA. Analysis of damage scores revealed complete agreement between US and MRI data in 43/55 (78%) comparisons; in 10/55 (18%) cases the US data were abnormal but the MRI data normal; in 2/55 (4%) cases, the MRI data were abnormal and the US data normal. Analysis of the inflammation scores revealed complete agreement between US and MRI data in 33/55 (60%) comparisons; in 3/55 (5%) cases US data were abnormal but MRI data normal; in 19/55 (35%) cases the MRI data were abnormal and the US data normal. There was a poor relationship between assessments based on clinical examination and imaging studies. Readers could not accurately identify the disease from imaging findings.

Conclusion

Based on our results, at the elbow, US and MR have different roles in assessing enthesitis, with US apparently the better diagnostic tool for assessing damage and MR the better tool for assessing inflammation. In this study enthesitis and synovitis in the painful elbow were found equally in cases of established RA and PsA.

Gladman DD, Mease PJ, Strand V, Healy P, Helliwell PS, Fitzgerald O, et al. Consensus on a core set of domains for psoriatic arthritis. J Rheumatol. 2007;34(5):1167–70.PubMed

Helliwell PS, FitzGerald O, Fransen J, Gladman DD, Kreuger GG, Callis-Duffin K, et al. The development of candidate composite disease activity and responder indices for psoriatic arthritis (GRACE project). Ann Rheum Dis. 2013;72(6):986–91.CrossRefPubMed

Mumtaz A, Gallagher P, Kirby B, Waxman R, Coates LC, Veale JD, et al. Development of a preliminary composite disease activity index in psoriatic arthritis. 2011;70(2):272–7.

Coates LC, Fransen J, Helliwell PS. Defining minimal disease activity in psoriatic arthritis: a proposed objective target for treatment. 2010;69(1):48–53.

McGonagle D, Gibbon W, Emery P. Classification of inflammatory arthritis by enthesitis. Lancet. 1998;352(9134):1137–40 (see comment).CrossRefPubMed

Helliwell PS, Porter G, group Cs. Sensitivity and specificity of plain radiographic features of peripheral enthesopathy at major sites in psoriatic arthritis. Skelet Radiol. 2007;36(11):1061–6.

Ibrahim GH, Groves C, Chandramohan M, Valle R, Beltran A, Reyes B, et al. Clinical and ultrasound validation of the Leeds Enthesitis Index in psoriatic arthritis and rheumatoid arthritis. ISRN Rheumatol. 2011;731917:5. doi:10.5402/2011/731917.

Frediani B, Falsetti P, Storri L, Allegri A, Bisogno S, Baldi F, et al. Ultrasound and clinical evaluation of quadricipital tendon enthesitis in patients with psoriatic arthritis and rheumatoid arthritis. Clin Rheumatol. 2002;21(4):294–8.CrossRefPubMed

Marzo-Ortega H, Tanner SF, Rhodes LA, Tan AL, Conaghan PG, Hensor EMA, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging in the assessment of metacarpophalangeal joint disease in early psoriatic and rheumatoid arthritis. Scan J Rheumatol. 2009;38(2):79–83.CrossRef

10.

McGonagle D. Imaging the joint and enthesis: insights into pathogenesis of psoriatic arthritis. Ann Rheum Dis. 2005;64[Suppl II]:ii58–60. doi:10.1136/ard.2004.034264.

11.

Healy P, Helliwell PS. Measuring clinical enthesitis in psoriatic arthritis:assessment of existing measures and development of an instrument specific for psoriatic arthritis. Arthritis Care Res. 2008;59(5):686–91.CrossRef

12.

Taylor WJ, Gladman DD, Helliwell PS, Marchesoni A, Mease PJ, Mielants H. Classification criteria for psoriatic arthritis. Arthritis Rheum. 2006;54(8):2665–73.CrossRefPubMed

13.

Terslev L, Naredo E, Iagnocco A, Balint PV, Wakefield RJ, Aegerter P, et al. Defining enthesitis in spondyloarthritis by ultrasound: results of a Delphi process and of a reliability reading exercise. Arthritis Care Res. 2014;66(5):741–8.CrossRef

14.

McQueen F, Lassere M, Bird P, Haavardsholm EA, Peterfy C, Conaghan PG, et al. Developing a magnetic resonance imaging scoring system for peripheral psoriatic arthritis. J Rheumatol. 2007;34(4):859–61.PubMed

15.

Arnett FC, Edworthy SM, Bloch DA. The American Rheumatism Association 1987 revised criteria for the classification of rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum. 1988;31(3):315–24.

16.

Levin D, Nazarian L, Miller T, O’Kane P, Feld R, Parker L, et al. Lateral epicondylitis of the elbow: US findings. Radiology. 2005;237(1):230–4.CrossRefPubMed

17.

Eshed I, Bollow M, McGonagle DG, Tan AL, Althoff CE, Asbach P, et al. MRI of enthesitis of the appendicular skeleton in spondyloarthritis. Ann Rheum Dis. 2007;66(12):1553–9.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

18.

D’Agostino MA, Said-Nahal R, Hacquard-Bouder C, Brasseur JL, Dougados M, Breban M. Assessment of peripheral enthesitis in the spondylarthropathies by ultrasonography combined with power Doppler: a cross-sectional study. 2003;48(2):523–33.

19.

Balint P, Kane D, Wilson H, McInnes I, Sturrock R. Ultrasonography of entheseal insertions in the lower limb in spondyloarthropathy. Ann Rheum Dis. 2002;61(10):905–10.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

20.

Aydin S, Tan AL, Hodgson R, Grainger A, Emery P, Wakefield RJ, et al. Comparison of ultrasonography and magnetic resonance imaging for the assessment of clinically defined knee enthesitis in spondyloarthritis. Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2013;31:933–6.PubMed

21.

McGonagle D, Gibbon W, O’Connor P, Green M, Pease C, Emery P. Characteristic magnetic resonance imaging entheseal changes of knee synovitis in spondylarthropathy. Arthritis Rheum. 1998;41(4):694–700.

22.

Hay EM, Paterson SM, Lewis M, Hosie G, Croft P. Pragmatic randomised controlled trial of local corticosteroid injection and naproxen for treatment of lateral epicondylitis of elbow in primary care. BMJ. 1999;319(7215):964–8.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral