Skip to main content
Home
Latest news
Browse topics
Lupus Rheumatoid arthritis Spondyloarthropathies COVID-19 Browse all topics
In focus
Bimekizumab: Dual IL-17A/IL-17F inhibition in SpA Anifrolumab for the treatment of SLE JAK inhibitor safety: Weighing up the data and understanding the risks Rituximab and rheumatology practice in the COVID-19 era Safety snapshot: Upadacitinib in patients with PsA Repurposing rheumatology drugs for COVID-19 Telemedicine in rheumatology: COVID-19 and beyond Managing PsA in resource-limited settings
Conferences
ACR Convergence 2022 EULAR 2022 Congress
About us
Medicine Matters Rheumatology
EXTENDED SEARCH
Top

04-02-2016 | Rheumatoid arthritis | Review | Article

Methotrexate and Rheumatoid Arthritis: Current Evidence Regarding Subcutaneous Versus Oral Routes of Administration

Journal: Advances in Therapy

Authors: Gerolamo Bianchi, Roberto Caporali, Monica Todoerti, Paolo Mattana

Publisher: Springer Healthcare

Login to get access

Abstract

Abstract

Methotrexate (MTX) is still considered the drug of choice in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) management. Comparing subcutaneous (MTX SC) and oral (MTX OR) routes of administration is important to optimize the everyday therapeutic strategy in the real-life setting. This review summarizes scientific evidence currently available on this topic. As shown by pharmacokinetic studies, at the same dose level, bioavailability of MTX SC is significantly higher and less variable than that of MTX OR. This difference is even more pronounced for medium-to-high dosages (i.e., >15 mg/week). With regard to clinical response (Disease Activity Score-28, American College of Rheumatology Criteria), randomized, double-blind studies and retrospective or longitudinal analyses in real-life settings showed that MTX SC is more effective than MTX OR. This is true both in MTX-naive patients with early RA, and in patients who switch from MTX OR to MTX SC due to previous treatment failure, lack of efficacy and/or adverse events. Finally, MTX SC has a better tolerability profile than MTX OR, with fewer gastroenterological side effects. Delaying the use of more expensive biological therapies by switching from MTX OR to MTX SC in non-responders might provide cost savings, with relevant implications in the management of patients with RA.

Funding

Alfa Wassermann.
Literature
1.
Bijlsma JW, Jacobs JW. Methotrexate: still the anchor drug in RA treatment. Jt Bone Spine. 2009;76(5):452–4.CrossRef
2.
Lopez-Olivo MA, Siddhanamatha HR, Shea B, Tugwell P, Wells GA, Suarez-Almazor ME. Methotrexate for treating rheumatoid arthritis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014;6:CD000957.
3.
Singh JA, Furst DE, Bharat A, et al. 2012 update of the 2008 American College of Rheumatology recommendations for the use of disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs and biologic agents in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2012;64(5):625–39.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
4.
Smolen JS, Landewe R, Breedveld FC, et al. EULAR recommendations for the management of rheumatoid arthritis with synthetic and biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs. Ann Rheum Dis. 2010;69(6):964–75.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
5.
Emery P, Sebba A, Huizinga TW. Biologic and oral disease-modifying antirheumatic drug monotherapy in rheumatoid arthritis. Ann Rheum Dis. 2013;72(12):1897–904.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
6.
Mouterde G, Baillet A, Gaujoux-Viala C, et al. Optimizing methotrexate therapy in rheumatoid arthritis: a systematic literature review. Jt Bone Spine. 2011;78(6):587–92.CrossRef
7.
Todoerti M, Maglione W, Bernero E, et al. Systematic review of 2008–2012 literature and update of recommendations for the use of methotrexate in rheumatic diseases, with a focus on rheumatoid arthritis. Reumatismo. 2013;65(5):207–18.CrossRefPubMed
8.
Verstappen SM, Jacobs JW, van der Veen MJ, et al. Intensive treatment with methotrexate in early rheumatoid arthritis: aiming for remission. Computer Assisted Management in Early Rheumatoid Arthritis (CAMERA, an open-label strategy trial). Ann Rheum Dis. 2007;66(11):1443–9.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
9.
Cipriani P, Ruscitti P, Carubbi F, Liakouli V, Giacomelli R. Methotrexate in rheumatoid arthritis: optimizing therapy among different formulations. Current and emerging paradigms. Clin Ther. 2014;36(3):427–35.CrossRefPubMed
10.
Visser K, van der Heijde D. Optimal dosage and route of administration of methotrexate in rheumatoid arthritis: a systematic review of the literature. Ann Rheum Dis. 2009;68(7):1094–9.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
11.
Jundt JW, Browne BA, Fiocco GP, Steele AD, Mock D. A comparison of low dose methotrexate bioavailability: oral solution, oral tablet, subcutaneous and intramuscular dosing. J Rheumatol. 1993;20(11):1845–9.PubMed
12.
Hoekstra M, Haagsma C, Neef C, Proost J, Knuif A, van de Laar M. Bioavailability of higher dose methotrexate comparing oral and subcutaneous administration in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. J Rheumatol. 2004;31(4):645–8.PubMed
13.
Schiff MH, Jaffe JS, Freundlich B. Head-to-head, randomised, crossover study of oral versus subcutaneous methotrexate in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: drug-exposure limitations of oral methotrexate at doses ≥15 mg may be overcome with subcutaneous administration. Ann Rheum Dis. 2014;73(8):1549–51.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
14.
Braun J, Kastner P, Flaxenberg P, et al. Comparison of the clinical efficacy and safety of subcutaneous versus oral administration of methotrexate in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis: results of a six-month, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, controlled, phase IV trial. Arthritis Rheum. 2008;58(1):73–81.CrossRefPubMed
15.
Bakker MF, Jacobs JW, Welsing PM, et al. Are switches from oral to subcutaneous methotrexate or addition of ciclosporin to methotrexate useful steps in a tight control treatment strategy for rheumatoid arthritis? A post hoc analysis of the CAMERA study. Ann Rheum Dis. 2010;69(10):1849–52.CrossRefPubMed
16.
Mainman H, McClaren E, Heycock C, Saravanan V, Hamilton J, Kelly C. When should we use parenteral methotrexate? Clin Rheumatol. 2010;29(10):1093–8.CrossRefPubMed
17.
Scott DG, Claydon P, Ellis C. Retrospective evaluation of continuation rates following a switch to subcutaneous methotrexate in rheumatoid arthritis patients failing to respond to or tolerate oral methotrexate: the MENTOR study. Scand J Rheumatol. 2014;43(6):470–6.CrossRefPubMed
18.
Rutkowska-Sak L, Rell-Bakalarska M, Lisowska B. Oral vs. subcutaneous low-dose methotrexate treatment in reducing gastrointestinal side effects. Reumatologia. 2009;47(7):207–11.
19.
Muller RB, von Kempis J, Haile SR, Schiff MH. Effectiveness, tolerability, and safety of subcutaneous methotrexate in early rheumatoid arthritis: a retrospective analysis of real-world data from the St. Gallen cohort. Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2015;45(1):28–34.CrossRefPubMed
20.
Smolen JS, Landewe R, Breedveld FC, et al. EULAR recommendations for the management of rheumatoid arthritis with synthetic and biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs: 2013 update. Ann Rheum Dis. 2014;73(3):492–509.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
21.
Hazlewood GS, Thorne JC, Pope JE, et al. The comparative effectiveness of oral versus subcutaneous methotrexate for the treatment of early rheumatoid arthritis. Ann Rheum Dis. 2015. pii: annrheumdis-2014- 206504. doi:10.​1136/​annrheumdis-2014-206504 [Epub ahead of print].
22.
De Leonardis F, Alivernini S, Bonacci E, et al. Italian consensus on the recommendations about the use of methotrexate for the treatment of rheumatic diseases with a focus on rheumatoid arthritis: results from the “3E initiative”. Reumatismo. 2010;62(1):34–45.PubMed
23.
Fitzpatrick R, Scott DG, Keary I. Cost-minimisation analysis of subcutaneous methotrexate versus biologic therapy for the treatment of patients with rheumatoid arthritis who have had an insufficient response or intolerance to oral methotrexate. Clin Rheumatol. 2013;32(11):1605–12.CrossRefPubMed
Image Credits