Skip to main content
Top

09-02-2018 | Rheumatoid arthritis | Article

Satisfaction with Subcutaneous Golimumab and its Auto-Injector among Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients with Inadequate Response to Adalimumab or Etanercept

Journal: The Patient - Patient-Centered Outcomes Research

Authors: Raphael J. Dehoratius, Lawrence H. Brent, Jeffrey R. Curtis, Lorie A Ellis, Kezhen L. Tang

Publisher: Springer International Publishing

Abstract

Background

Patient perceptions of treatment success, including satisfaction/preference, may complement clinical efficacy assessments.

Objective

Our objective was to evaluate satisfaction with subcutaneous golimumab and its auto-injector in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and an inadequate adalimumab/etanercept response.

Methods

In the multicenter, assessor-blinded GO-SAVE study, 433 patients with active RA (28-joint Disease Activity Score incorporating erythrocyte sedimentation rate [DAS28-ESR] ≥ 3.6 and six or more swollen and six or more tender joints) despite methotrexate and past adalimumab/etanercept treatment received open-label subcutaneous golimumab 50 mg every 4 weeks (q4w) through week 12. Week 16 responders (DAS28-ESR improvement from baseline > 1.2 and score ≤ 3.2) continued therapy through week 52; nonresponders were randomized (1:2) to double-blind subcutaneous golimumab 50 mg q4w or intravenous golimumab 2 mg/kg [weeks 16, 20, every 8 weeks (q8w)]. Patients rated satisfaction with their injection experience on a 5-point scale (1 = very dissatisfied; 5 = very satisfied) at screening, week 8 (all enrolled patients), and week 44 (for patients continuing open-label subcutaneous golimumab 50 mg q4w). Discomfort, pain, stinging, burning, and redness related to injection were assessed (none, mild, moderate, severe).

Results

Similar proportions of patients (N = 433) had most recently received adalimumab (50.3%) or etanercept (49.7%) prior to golimumab. Overall satisfaction (somewhat/very) with the golimumab injection experience was reported by 84.4% of patients at week 8 versus 63.4% of patients who were satisfied with prior adalimumab/etanercept. Patients receiving open-label subcutaneous golimumab through week 44 (N = 75) reported much less discomfort (60.9%), redness (60.9%), pain (59.4%), stinging (67.2%), and burning (65.6%) with the golimumab injection than with their previous tumor necrosis factor antagonist medication injection.

Conclusion

Most patients with RA receiving golimumab following adalimumab/etanercept inadequate response were satisfied with their overall golimumab experience, including its auto-injector versus their previous injection device.

Clinical trials.gov

NCT01004432; EudraCT 2009-010582-23.
Literature
1.
Crow R, Gage H, Hampson S, et al. The measurement of satisfaction with healthcare: implications for practice from a systematic review of the literature. Health Technol Assess. 2002;6:1–244.CrossRefPubMed
2.
Ingersoll KS, Cohen J. The impact of medication regimen factors on adherence to chronic treatment: a review of literature. J Behav Med. 2008;31:213–24.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
3.
Barton JL. Patient preferences and satisfaction in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis with biologic therapy. Patient Prefer Adherence. 2009;3:335–44.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
4.
Poulos C, Hauber AB, González JM, et al. Patients’ willingness to trade off between the duration and frequency of rheumatoid arthritis treatments. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2014;66:1008–15.CrossRefPubMed
5.
Bolge SC, Goren A, Tandon N. Reasons for discontinuation of subcutaneous biologic therapy in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis: a patient perspective. Patient Prefer Adherence. 2015;9:121–31.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
6.
Huffstutter JE, Kafka S, Brent LH, et al. Clinical response to golimumab in rheumatoid arthritis patients who were receiving etanercept or adalimumab: results of a multicenter active treatment study. Curr Med Res Opin. 2017;33:657–66.CrossRefPubMed
7.
van Riel PL, van Gestel AM, Scott DL. EULAR handbook of clinical assessments in rheumatoid arthritis. Alphen Aan Den Rijn: Van Zuiden Communications, B.V; 2000. p. 1–54.
8.
Farley H, Enguidanos ER, Coletti CM, et al. Patient satisfaction surveys and quality of care: an information paper. Ann Emerg Med. 2014;64:351–7.CrossRefPubMed
10.
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services. Oncology care model. http://​innovation.​cms.​gov/​initiatives/​Oncology-Care/​. Accessed 17 June 2015.
11.
Hudry C, Lebrun A, Moura B, Zinovieva E, Backers O, Herman-Demars H. Evaluation of usability and acceptance of a new autoinjector intended for methotrexate subcutaneous self-administration in the management of rheumatoid arthritis. Rheumatol Ther. 2017;4:183–94.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
12.
Borrás-Blasco J, Gracia-Pérez A, Casterá MD, Rosique-Robles JD, Abad J. Educational session as a tool to increase patient satisfaction of switching etanercept from the prefilled syringe to the autoinjection pen. Expert Opin Biol Ther. 2013;13:1103–8.CrossRefPubMed
13.
Borrás-Blasco J, Gracia-Pérez A, Rosique-Robles JD, Casterá MD, Abad FJ. Acceptability of switching adalimumab from a prefilled syringe to an autoinjection pen. Expert Opin Biol Ther. 2010;10:301–7.CrossRefPubMed
14.
Corominas H, Garcia-Diaz S, Sanchez-Eslava L, Fíguls R. Switching adalimumab from syringe to pen. Expected outcomes. Expert Opin Biol Ther. 2012;12:805–6.CrossRefPubMed