Skip to main content
Log in

Peripheral bone mineral density and its predictors in healthy school girls from two different socioeconomic groups in Delhi

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Osteoporosis International Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Summary

Peripheral bone density measurements are scarce and the factors, which predict bone mineral density at these sites, especially in children, are not clearly known. In this study, age, height, weight and alkaline phosphatase had a significant association on peripheral bone mineral density in healthy Indian school girls.

Introduction

Factors that lead to the attainment of peak bone mass at peripheral sites, during period of growth are not clearly known.

Methods

Six-hundred and sixty-four randomly selected 7- to 17-year-old girls from upper and lower socioeconomic status (USES/LSES) schools were assessed clinically and a recording of their height and weight was undertaken. Serum calcium, phosphorus, total alkaline phosphatase (ALP), 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25-OHD) and parathyroid hormone (PTH) were measured in all of them. Bone mineral density (BMD) was measured at the distal forearm (BMDdf) and calcaneum (BMDca) by peripheral dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (pDXA).

Results

Girls belonging to the USES were significantly taller (149.7 ± 12.3 cm vs 144.4 ± 11.9 cm; P < 0.001) and weighed more (44.3 ± 12.9 kg vs 35.9 ± 10.0 kg; P < 0.001) than girls from the LSES. USES girls had a significantly higher mean serum calcium (9.3 ± 0.7 mg/dl vs 9.2 ± 0.8 mg/dl; P < 0.05) and significantly lower alkaline phosphatase (316 ± 166 IU/l vs 423 ± 228 IU/l; P < 0.01) and iPTH (29.9 ± 18.4 pg/ml vs 45.7 ± 64.6 pg/ml; P < 0.01). There was no significant difference in mean serum phosphorus and 25-OHD levels between the two groups. USES subjects had higher BMD at both sites than LSES subjects. BMDdf and BMDca increased with age and tended to plateau by 16 years and 12 years of age respectively in both the groups. Age, height and weight explained approximately 50% of the variability, while biochemical parameters explained approximately 30% of variability in BMD at both the sites. The only biochemical parameter which had a significant association with BMD was ALP at the distal forearm.

Conclusion

In conclusion, age, nutrition, height and weight are significantly associated with BMD at peripheral sites.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bachrach LK (2005) Osteoporosis and measurement of bone mass in children and adolescents. Endocrinol Metab Clin North Am 34:521–535

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Mora S, Gilsanz V (2003) Establishment of peak bone mass. Endocrinol Metab Clin North Am 32:39–63

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Chinn DJ, Fordham JN, Kibirige MS et al (2005) Bone density at the os calcis: reference values, reproducibility, and associations of fracture history and physical activity. Arch Dis Child 90:30–35

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Hernandez-Prado B, Lazcano-Ponce E, Cruz-Valdez A et al (2002) Validity of bone mineral density measurements in distal sites as an indicator of total bone mineral density in a group of pre-adolescent and adolescent women. Arch Med Res 33:33–39

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Miller PD, Siris ES, Barrett-Connor E et al (2002) Prediction of fracture risk in postmenopausal white women with peripheral bone densitometry: Evidence from the National Osteoporosis Risk Assessment. J Bone Miner Res 17:2222–2230

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Leib ES, Lewiecki EM, Binkley N et al (2004) Official positions of the International Society for Clinical Densitometry. J Clin Densitom 7:1–5

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Blake GM, Chinn DJ, Steel SA et al (2005) A list of device-specific thresholds for the clinical interpretation of peripheral X-ray absorptiometry examinations. Osteoporos Int 16:2149–2156

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Marwaha RK, Tandon N, Reddy DHK et al (2005) Vitamin D and bone mineral density status of healthy schoolchildren in northern India. Am J Clin Nutr 82:477–482

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Afghani A, Xie B, Wiswell RA et al (2003) Bone mass of Asian adolescents in China: influence of physical activity and smoking. Med Sci Sports Exerc 35:720–729

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Matsukura T, Kagamimori S, Yamagami T et al (2000) Reference data of forearm bone mineral density in healthy Japanese male and female subjects in the second decade based on calendar age and puberty onset: Japanese Population Based Osteoporosis (JPOS) study. Osteoporos Int 11: 858–865

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Ikeda Y, Iki M, Morita A et al (2004) Ultrasound bone densitometry of the calcaneus, determined with Sahara, in healthy Japanese adolescents: Japanese Population-based Osteoporosis (JPOS) Study. J Bone Miner Metab 22:248–253

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Tandon N, Marwaha RK, Kalra S et al (2003) Bone mineral parameters in healthy young Indian adults with optimal vitamin D availability. Natl Med J India 16:298–302

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Zanchetta JR, Plotkin H, Alvarez Filgueira ML (1995) Bone mass in children: normative values for the 2–20-year-old population. Bone 16:393S–399S

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Arabi A, Nabulsi M, Maalouf J et al (2004) Bone mineral density by age, gender, pubertal stages, and socioeconomic status in healthy Lebanese children and adolescents. Bone 35:1169–1179

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Rubin K, Schirduan V, Gendreau P et al (1993) Predictors of axial and peripheral bone mineral density in healthy children and adolescents, with special attention to the role of puberty. J Pediatr 123:863–870

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Katzman DK, Bachrach LK, Carter DR et al (1991) Clinical and anthropometric correlates of bone mineral acquisition in healthy adolescent girls. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 73:1332–1339

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Matkovic V, Jelic T, Wardlaw GM et al (1994) Timing of peak bone mass in Caucasian females and its implication for the prevention of osteoporosis. Inference from a cross-sectional model. J Clin Invest 93:799–808

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Gunnes M (1994) Bone mineral density in the cortical and trabecular distal forearm in healthy children and adolescents. Acta Paediatr 83:463–467

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Volta C, Bagni B, Iughetti L et al (2004) Bone mass evaluated by calcaneous ultrasound and radial peripheral computed tomography in 726 youngsters. Acta Pediatr 93:747–751

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Pettifor JM, Moodley GP (1997) Appendicular bone mass in children with a high prevalence of low dietary calcium intakes. J Bone Miner Res 12:1824–1832

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Kardinaal AF, Hoorneman G, Vaananen K et al (2000) Determinants of bone mass and bone geometry in adolescent and young adult women. Calcif Tissue Int 66:81–89

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Cheng JCY, Leung SSSF, Lee WTK et al (1998) Determinants of axial and peripheral bone mass in Chinese adolescents. Arch Dis Child 78:524–530

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Arabi A, Tamim H, Nabulsi M et al (2004) Sex differences in the association of body-composition variables on bone mass in healthy children and adolescents. Am J Clin Nutr 80:1428–1435

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Gunnes M, Lehmann EH (1995) Dietary calcium, saturated fat, fiber and vitamin C as predictors of forearm cortical and trabecular bone mineral density in healthy children and adolescents. Acta Paediatr.84:388–392

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Cvijetic S, Baric IC, Bolanca S et al (2003) Ultrasound bone measurement in children and adolescents. Correlation with nutrition, puberty, anthropometry, and physical activity. J Clin Epidemiol 56:591–597

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Novotny R, Daida YG, Grove JS et al (2004) Adolescent dairy consumption and physical activity associated with bone mass. Prev Med 39:355–360

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Kardinaal AF, Ando S, Charles P et al (1999) Dietary calcium and bone density in adolescent girls and young women in Europe. J Bone Miner Res 14:583–592

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Outila TA, Karkkainen MUM, Lamberg-Allardt CJE (2001) Vitamin D status affects serum parathyroid hormone concentrations during winter in female adolescents: associations with forearm bone mineral density. Am J Clin Nutr 74:206–210

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Stein EM, Laing EM, Hall DB et al (2006) Serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D concentrations in girls aged 4–8 y living in the southeastern United States. Am J Clin Nutr 83:75–81

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Cheng S, Tylavsky F, Kroger H et al (2003) Association of low 25-hydroxyvitamin D concentrations with elevated parathyroid hormone concentrations and low cortical bone density in early pubertal and prepubertal Finnish girls. Am J Clin Nutr 78:485–492

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Bonofiglio D, Maggiolini M, Catalano S et al (2000). Parathyroid hormone is elevated but bone markers and density are normal in young female subjects who consume inadequate dietary calcium. Br J Nutr 84:111–116

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. van Coeverden SCCM, Netelenbos JC, de Ridder CM et al (2002) Bone metabolism markers and bone mass in healthy pubertal boys and girls. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 57:107–116

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Lehtonen-Veromaa M, Mottonen T, Irjala K et al (2000) A 1-year prospective study on the relationship between physical activity, markers of bone metabolism, and bone acquisition in peripubertal girls. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 85:3726–3732

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Mora S, Pitukcheewanont P, Kaufman FR et al (1999) Biochemical markers of bone turnover and the volume and the density of bone in children at different stages of sexual development. J Bone Miner Res 14:1664–1671

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Libanati C, Baylink DJ, Lois-Wenzel E et al (1999) Studies on the potential mediators of skeletal changes occurring during puberty in girls. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab 84:2807–2814

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Ross PD, Knowlton W (1998) Rapid bone loss is associated with increased levels of biochemical markers. J Bone Miner Res 13:297–302

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Rosen CJ, Chesnut III CH, Mallinak NJS (1997) The predictive value of biochemical markers of bone turnover for bone mineral density in early postmenopausal women treated with hormone replacement or calcium supplementation. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 82:1904–1910

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Moncrieff MW, Lunt HRW, Arthur LJH (1973) Nutritional rickets at puberty. Arch Dis Child 48:221–224

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to R. K. Marwaha.

Additional information

R. K. Marwaha and N. Tandon are to be considered as joint first authors.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Marwaha, R.K., Tandon, N., Reddy, D.H.K. et al. Peripheral bone mineral density and its predictors in healthy school girls from two different socioeconomic groups in Delhi. Osteoporos Int 18, 375–383 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-006-0247-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-006-0247-2

Keywords

Navigation