Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Importance of bone mineral density measurements in evaluating fragility bone fracture risk in Asian Indian men

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Osteoporosis International Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Summary

We evaluated the effect of BMD on fracture risk prediction using FRAX® among Asian Indian men when used in conjunction with clinical risk factors. A majority of our subjects were either osteopenic or osteoporotic, and their fracture risk increased when FRAX® was used in conjunction with femur neck T-scores.

Introduction

Asian Indian men living in the United States may represent a population that is at high and underappreciated risk for fragility bone fractures.

Purpose

To evaluate the effect of BMD on fracture risk prediction using FRAX® among Asian Indian men when used in conjunction with clinical risk factors.

Methods

Forty four Asian Indian men (mean age 64.9 (±8.4) years) who had lived in the United States for an average of 33.6 (±10.6) years underwent BMD measurement at the proximal femur. Subjects were subjected to a general physical exam and history of fracture, hip fracture in a parent, current smoking and alcohol use, and diagnosis of inflammatory arthritis was obtained. Data from each subject were entered into the FRAX® algorithm and 10-year fracture probabilities were calculated using clinical risk factors (CRFs) alone and in combination with femur neck T-scores.

Results

Thirteen subjects (29.5%) had femur neck T-scores ≥ −1.0, 28 (63.6%) T-scores between −1.0 and −2.5, and three (6.8%) T-scores < −2.5. The 10-year probability of a major osteoporotic fracture based on a combination of clinical risk factors and femur neck T-scores was significantly higher than the fracture probability based on clinical risk factors alone (t(43) = 2.58, p = 0.01).

Conclusions

Among Asian Indian men, the 10-year probability of a major osteoporotic fracture increases when femur neck T-scores are added to clinical risk factors in the FRAX® algorithm, and this population have a high fracture probability even in the absence of clinical risk factors.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Gupta A (1996) Osteoporosis in India—the nutritional hypothesis. Natl Med J India 9:268–274

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Malhotra N, Mithal A (2008) Osteoporosis in Indians. Indian J Med Res 127:263–268

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Center JR, Nguyen TV, Schneider D, Sambrook PN, Eisman JA (1999) Mortality after all major types of osteoporotic fracture in men and women: an observational study. Lancet 353:878–882

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Nordin BE (1966) International patterns of osteoporosis. Clin Orthop Relat Res 45:17–30

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Johnell O, Kanis JA (2006) An estimate of the worldwide prevalence and disability associated with osteoporotic fractures. Osteoporos Int 17:1726–1733

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Kadam N, Khadilkar A, Chiplonkar S, Khadilkar V, Mughal Z (2009) Variation in lumbar spine bone mineral content by age and gender in apparently healthy Indians. J Bone Miner Metab

  7. Kanis JA, Oden A, Johansson H, Borgstrom F, Strom O, McCloskey E (2009) FRAX and its applications to clinical practice. Bone 44:734–743

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Johansson H, Kanis JA, Oden A, Johnell O, McCloskey E (2009) BMD, clinical risk factors and their combination for hip fracture prevention. Osteoporos Int 20:1675–1682

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Chakravarti A (2009) Human genetics: tracing India's invisible threads. Nature 461:487–488

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Reich D, Thangaraj K, Patterson N, Price AL, Singh L (2009) Reconstructing Indian population history. Nature 461:489–494

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Kanis JA, Johnell O, De Laet C, Jonsson B, Oden A, Ogelsby AK (2002) International variations in hip fracture probabilities: implications for risk assessment. J Bone Miner Res 17:1237–1244

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Lewiecki EM, Watts NB, McClung MR, Petak SM, Bachrach LK, Shepherd JA, Downs RW Jr, International Society for Clinical Densitometry (2004) Official positions of the international society for clinical densitometry. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 89:3651–3655

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (2002) Screening for osteoporosis in postmenopausal women: recommendations and rationale. Ann Intern Med 137:526–528

    Google Scholar 

  14. Bone health and osteoporosis: a report of the surgeon general (2004) Retrieved December/11, 2005, from http://www.surgeongeneral.gov/library/bonehealth

  15. Siris ES, Miller PD, Barrett-Connor E, Faulkner KG, Wehren LE, Abbott TA, Berger ML, Santora AC, Sherwood LM (2001) Identification and fracture outcomes of undiagnosed low bone mineral density in postmenopausal women: results from the National Osteoporosis Risk Assessment. JAMA 286:2815–2822

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Solomon DH, Connelly MT, Rosen CJ, Dawson-Hughes B, Kiel DP, Greenspan SL, Leib ES, Holick M, Miguel AH, Finkelstein JS (2003) Factors related to the use of bone densitometry: survey responses of 494 primary care physicians in New England. Osteoporos Int 14:123–129

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. McNally DN, Kenny AM, Smith JA (2007) Adherence of academic geriatric practitioners to osteoporosis screening guidelines. Osteoporos Int 18:177–183

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank Ms. Linda Gregory and Ms. Harriet Zawistowski for their help in subject enrollment. We also thank Ms. Alison Kleppinger and Ms. Alis Ohlheiser for their help in data entry and management.

This study was supported by a grant from the Patrick and Catherine Weldon Donaghue Foundation. We acknowledge the support of the University of Connecticut General Clinical Research Center. NIH grant # M01 RR06192.

Conflicts of interest

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to T. V. Rajan.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kuruvilla, K., Kenny, A.M., Raisz, L.G. et al. Importance of bone mineral density measurements in evaluating fragility bone fracture risk in Asian Indian men. Osteoporos Int 22, 217–221 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-010-1237-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-010-1237-y

Keywords

Navigation