Skip to main content
Log in

Magnitude and consequences of misclassification of incident hip fractures in large cohort studies: the Study of Osteoporotic Fractures and Medicare claims data

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Osteoporosis International Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Summary

In the Study of Osteoporotic Fractures (SOF), 18.5 % of incident hip fractures identified in Medicare Fee-for-Service claims data were not reported to or confirmed by the cohort. Cognitive impairment was a modest risk factor for false-negative hip fracture ascertainment via self-report.

Introduction

Prospective cohort studies of fractures that rely on participant self-report to be the initial signal of an incident fracture could be prone to bias if a significant proportion of fractures are not self-reported.

Methods

We used data from the SOF merged with Medicare Fee-for-Service claims data to estimate the proportion of participants who had an incident hip fracture identified in Medicare claims that was either not self-reported or confirmed (by review of radiographic reports) in SOF.

Results

Between 1/1/1991 and 12/31/2007, 647 SOF participants had a hip fracture identified in Medicare claims, but 120 (18.5 %) were either not reported to or confirmed by the cohort. False-negative hip fracture ascertainment was associated with a reduced modified Mini-Mental State Exam (MMSE) score (odds ratio 1.31 per SD decrease, 95 % C.I. 1.06–1.63). Point estimates of associations of predictors of incident hip fracture were changed minimally when the misclassification of incident hip fracture status was corrected with use of claims data.

Conclusions

A substantial minority of incident hip fractures were not reported to or confirmed in the SOF. Cognitive impairment was modestly associated with false-negative hip fracture ascertainment. While there was no evidence to suggest that misclassification of incident hip fracture status resulted in biased associations of potential predictors with hip fracture in this study, false-negative incident fracture ascertainment in smaller cohort studies with limited power may increase the risk of type 2 error (not finding significant associations of predictors with incident fractures).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bergmann MM, Byers T, Freedman DS et al (1998) Validity of self-reported diagnoses leading to hospitalization: a comparison of self-reports with hospital records in a prospective study of American adults. Am J Epidemiol 147(10):969–977

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Chen Z, Kooperberg C, Pettinger MB et al (2004) Validity of self-report for fractures among a multiethnic cohort of postmenopausal women: results from the Women's Health Initiative observational study and clinical trials. Menopause 11(3):264–274

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Honkanen K, Honkanen R, Heikkinen L et al (1999) Validity of self-reports of fractures in perimenopausal women. Am J Epidemiol 150(5):511–516

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Ismail AA, O'Neill TW, Cockerill W et al (2000) Validity of self-report of fractures: results from a prospective study in men and women across Europe. EPOS Study Group. European Prospective Osteoporosis Study Group. Osteoporos Int 11(3):248–254

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Beard CM, Melton LJ 3rd, Cedel SL et al (1990) Ascertainment of risk factors for osteoporosis: comparison of interview data with medical record review. J Bone Miner Res 5(7):691–699

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Ivers RQ, Cumming RG, Mitchell P et al (2002) The accuracy of self-reported fractures in older people. J Clin Epidemiol 55(5):452–457

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Hundrup YA, Hoidrup S, Obel EB et al (2004) The validity of self-reported fractures among Danish female nurses: comparison with fractures registered in the Danish National Hospital Register. Scand J Public Health 32(2):136–143

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Siggeirsdottir K, Aspelund T, Sigurdsson G et al (2007) Inaccuracy in self-report of fractures may underestimate association with health outcomes when compared with medical record based fracture registry. Eur J Epidemiol 22(9):631–639

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Virnig B, Durham SB, Folsom AR et al (2010) Linking the Iowa Women's Health Study cohort to Medicare data: linkage results and application to hip fracture. Am J Epidemiol 172(3):327–333

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Ray WA, Griffin MR, Fought RL et al (1992) Identification of fractures from computerized Medicare files. J Clin Epidemiol 45(7):703–714

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Cummings SR, Black DM, Nevitt MC et al (1990) Appendicular bone density and age predict hip fracture in women. The Study of Osteoporotic Fractures Research Group. Jama 263(5):665–668

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Kushi LH, Kaye SA, Folsom AR et al (1988) Accuracy and reliability of self-measurement of body girths. Am J Epidemiol 128(4):740–748

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Potosky AL, Riley GF, Lubitz JD et al (1993) Potential for cancer related health services research using a linked Medicare-tumor registry database. Med Care 31(8):732–748

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Magaziner J, Bassett SS, Hebel JR (1987) Predicting performance on the Mini-Mental State Examination. Use of age- and education-specific equations. J Am Geriatr Soc 35(11):996–1000

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Teng EL, Chui HC (1987) The Modified Mini-Mental State (3MS) examination. J Clin Psychiatry 48(8):314–318

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Taylor BC, Schreiner PJ, Stone KL et al (2004) Long-term prediction of incident hip fracture risk in elderly white women: study of osteoporotic fractures. J Am Geriatr Soc 52(9):1479–1486

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Schousboe JT, Fink HA, Taylor BC et al (2005) Association between self-reported prior wrist fractures and risk of subsequent hip and radiographic vertebral fractures in older women: a prospective study. J Bone Miner Res 20(1):100–106

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Cummings SR, Nevitt MC, Browner WS et al (1995) Risk factors for hip fracture in white women. Study of Osteoporotic Fractures Research Group. N Engl J Med 332(12):767–773

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Source of funding

The Study of Osteoporotic Fractures (SOF) is supported by the National Institutes of Health funding. The National Institute on Aging (NIA) provides support under the following grant numbers: R01 AG005407, R01 AR35582, R01 AR35583, R01 AR35584, R01 AG005394, R01 AG027574, and R01 AG027576. Dr. Curtis receives support from the NIH (AR053351) and the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (R01HS018517). The purchase of the linked CMS administrative claims data was supported, in part, by a grant to Dr. Curtis from the Arthritis Foundation.

Disclaimer

The views expressed herein do not necessarily represent the views of the Department of Veterans Affairs or the United States Government.

Conflicts of interest

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to J. T. Schousboe.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Schousboe, J.T., Paudel, M.L., Taylor, B.C. et al. Magnitude and consequences of misclassification of incident hip fractures in large cohort studies: the Study of Osteoporotic Fractures and Medicare claims data. Osteoporos Int 24, 801–810 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-012-2210-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-012-2210-8

Keywords

Navigation