Skip to main content
Log in

Impact of a Phone Follow-Up Program on Persistence with Teriparatide or PTH(1–84) Treatment

  • Original Research
  • Published:
Calcified Tissue International Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A follow-up program to help patients suffering from severe osteoporosis during their therapy with teriparatide or PTH(1–84) has been designed and performed. The objective of this study was to evaluate the 18-month persistence on these therapies in patients participating in the program. We enrolled 382 patients who started teriparatide or PTH(1–84) following this program and compared them with a historical cohort of 398 patients treated with the same therapies but who did not participate in any follow-up program. At the beginning of the therapy, nurses trained patients on self-injection. Patients received one phone call per week during the first month, then one phone call per month and per 3 months during the following 5 and 12 months, respectively. In every call, nurses helped patients to resolve any possible issues and collected adverse event information. The persistence rate of the group following the program was 85.6%, 8.2% higher than that of the group not following any program (77.4%). The log-rank test on persistence rates on therapy in patients enrolled and not enrolled in the program was performed; the difference was statistically significant (P = 0.006). Discontinuation in the follow-up program group occurred mainly at early stages of the treatment due to adverse events. Our results show that patients suffering from severe osteoporosis treated with teriparatide or PTH(1–84) and enrolled in a follow-up program have higher persistence rates than patients not following the program.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Neer RM, Arnaud CD, Zanchetta JR, Prince R, Gaich GA, Reginster JY, Hodsman AB, Eriksen EF, Ish-Shalom S, Genant HK, Wang O, Mitlak BH (2001) Effect of parathyroid hormone (1–34) on fractures and bone mineral density in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis. N Engl J Med 344:1434–1441

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Greenspan SL, Bone HG, Ettinger MP, Hanley DA, Lindsay R, Zanchetta JR, Blosch CM, Mathisen AL, Morris SA, Marriott TB (2007) Effect of recombinant human parathyroid hormone (1–84) on vertebral fracture and bone mineral density in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis: a randomized trial. Ann Intern Med 146:326–339

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Cramer JA, Amonkar MM, Hebborn A, Altman R (2005) Compliance and persistence with bisphosphonate dosing regimens among women with postmenopausal osteoporosis. Curr Med Res Opin 21:1453–1460

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Rabenda V, Mertens R, Fabri V, Vanoverloop J, Sumkay F, Vannecke C, Deswaef A, Verpooten GA, Reginster JY (2008) Adherence to bisphosphonates therapy and hip fracture risk in osteoporotic women. Osteoporos Int 19:811–818

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Cano A (1994) Compliance to hormone replacement therapy in menopausal women controller in a third level academy centre. Maturitas 20:91–99

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Kotzan JA, Martin BC, Wade WE (1999) Persistence with oestrogen therapy in a postmenopausal Medicaid population. Pharmacotherapy 19:363–369

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Turbí C, Herrero-Beaumont G, Acebes JC, Torrijos A, Graña J, Miguélez R, Sacristán J, Marín F (2004) Compliance and satisfaction with raloxifene versus alendronate for the treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis in clinical practice: an open-label, prospective, nonrandomized, observational study. Clin Ther 26:245–256

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Ziller V, Wetzel K, Hadji P (2010) Adherence and persistence in patients with postmenopausal osteoporosis treated with raloxifene. Climateric. doi:10.3109/13697137.2010.514628

  9. Giusti A, Barone A, Razzano M, Oliveri M, Pizzonia M, Palummeri E, Pioli G (2009) Persistence with calcium and vitamin D in elderly patients after hip fracture. J Bone Miner Metab 27:95–100

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Siris ES, Selby PL, Saag KG, Borgström F, Herings RM, Silverman SL (2009) Impact of osteoporosis treatment adherence on fracture rates in North America and Europe. Am J Med 122:S3–S13

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Silverman SL, Gold DT, Cramer JA (2007) Reduced fracture rates observed only in patients with proper persistence and compliance with bisphosphonate therapies. South Med J 100:1214–1218

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Curtis JR, Westfall AO, Cheng H, Lyles K, Saag KG, Delzell E (2008) Benefit of adherence with bisphosphonates depends on age and fracture type: results from an analysis of 101,038 new bisphosphonate users. J Bone Miner Res 23:1435–1441

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Cortet B, Benichou O (2006) Adherence, persistence, concordance: do we provide optimal management to our patients with osteoporosis? Joint Bone Spine 73:1–7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Weycker D, Macarios D, Edelsberg J, Oster G (2006) Compliance with drug therapy for postmenopausal osteoporosis. Osteoporos Int 17:1645–1652

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Ziller V, Zimmermann SP, Kalder M, Ziller M, Seker-Pektas B, Hellmeyer L, Hadji P (2010) Adherence and persistence in patients with severe osteoporosis treated with teriparatide. Curr Med Res Opin 26:675–681

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Adachi JD, Hanley DA, Lorraine JK, Yu M (2007) Assessing compliance, acceptance, and tolerability of teriparatide in patients with osteoporosis who fractured while on antiresorptive treatment or were intolerant to previous antiresorptive treatment: an 18-month, multicenter, open-label, prospective study. Clin Ther 29:2055–2067

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Foster SA, Foley KA, Meadows ES, Johnston JA, Wang SS, Pohl GM, Long SR (2011) Adherence and persistence with teriparatide among patients with commercial, Medicare, and Medicaid insurance. Osteoporos Int 22:551–557

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Langdahl BL, Rajzbaum G, Jakob F, Karras D, Ljunggren O, Lems WF, Fahrleitner-Pammer A, Walsh JB, Barker C, Kutahov A, Marin F (2009) Reduction in fracture rate and back pain and increased quality of life in postmenopausal women treated with teriparatide: 18-month data from the European Forsteo Observational Study (EFOS). Calcif Tissue Int 85:484–493

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Papaioannou A, Ioannidis G, Adachi JD, Sebaldt RJ, Ferko N, Puglia M, Brown J, Tenenhouse A, Olszynski WP, Boulos P, Hanley DA, Josse R, Murray TM, Petrie A, Goldsmith CH (2003) Adherence to bisphosphonates and hormone replacement therapy in a tertiary care setting of patients in the CANDOO database. Osteoporos Int 14:808–813

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Briot K, Ravaud P, Dargent-Molina P, Zylberman M, Liu-Leage S, Roux C (2009) Persistence with teriparatide in postmenopausal osteoporosis; impact of a patient education and follow-up program: the French experience. Osteoporos Int 20:625–630

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Arden NK, Earl S, Fisher DJ, Cooper C, Carruthers S, Goater M (2006) Persistence with teriparatide in patients with osteoporosis: the UK experience. Osteoporos Int 17:1626–1629

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Abhishek A, Pande I (2009) Teriparatide in men: persistence and geographical variation in the UK. Osteoporos Int 20:1453–1454

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Mulgund M, Beattie KA, Wong AKO, Papaioannou A, Adachi J (2009) Assessing adherence to teriparatide therapy, causes of nonadherence and effect of adherence on bone mineral density measurements in osteoporotic patients at high risk for fracture. Ther Adv Musculoskel Dis 1:5–11

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The study was funded by an unrestricted grant by Eli Lilly. The authors thank Dr. Massimo Cravero, Giovanni Bosco Hospital of Torino; Dr. Maurilio Massara, Maggiore della Carità Hospital of Novara; Dr. Laura Gianotti, S. Croce e Carle Hospital of Cuneo; Dr. Pier Andrea Rocchetta, SS. A. Biagio-C. Arrigo Hospital of Alessandria; Dr. Maurizio Mondavio, Hospital of Acqui Terme; and Dr. Marco Ovio, S. Corona Hospital of Pietraligure for participating in data collection.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Cristina Tamone.

Additional information

The authors have stated that they have no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Tamone, C., Fonte, G., Panico, A. et al. Impact of a Phone Follow-Up Program on Persistence with Teriparatide or PTH(1–84) Treatment. Calcif Tissue Int 90, 272–278 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00223-012-9574-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00223-012-9574-9

Keywords

Navigation