Skip to main content
Log in

Prevalence of femoroacetabular impingement in Asian patients with osteoarthritis of the hip

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
International Orthopaedics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Although femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) has recently been considered to be one of the causes of osteoarthritis (OA) of the hip, the exact pathogeneses and incidence of FAI and primary OA are unknown. The purposes of this study were to investigate the causes of hip OA in Japan and to clarify the prevalence of FAI in patients with hip OA. We retrospectively investigated 817 consecutive patients (946 hips) who underwent primary surgery with the diagnosis of OA of the hip. Clinical recordings and preoperative radiographs were evaluated to determine the cause of OA. There were 17 hips who had primary OA, of which six hips were determined to be FAI positive. The remaining 11 cases without FAI had primary OA of unknown aetiology. Our study has revealed that most hip OA cases were caused by developmental dysplasia of the hip. We only found a few cases (0.6%) with FAI in Japan.

Résumé

Bien que le conflit fémoro acétabulaire (FAI) ait été récemment considéré comme l’une des causes de l’arthrose (OA) de la hanche, la pathogénie exacte et l’incidence du conflit dans l’arthrose primaire restent malgré tout peu connues. Le but de cette étude est d’étudier les causes de l’arthrose de hanche au Japon et de clarifier la prévalence du conflit fémoro acétabulaire chez les patients présentant une telle arthrose. Nous avons respectivement revu 817 patients consécutifs (946 hanches) qui avaient bénéficié d’une intervention primaire chirurgicale pour le diagnostic d’OA de la hanche. Les données cliniques et les radiographies per-opératoires ont également été étudiées pour déterminer les causes de cette arthrose. 17 hanches présentaient une arthrose primaire, 6 sur les 17 étaient secondaires à un conflit fémoro acétabulaire. Pour les 11 hanches restantes, sans conflit fémoro acétabulaire, nous n’avons pu déterminer l’étiologie de l’arthrose. Notre étude révèle que la plupart des arthroses de hanche sont causées par la dysplasie de la hanche. Nous avons trouvé qu’un nombre de cas peu important, 0,6% de conflit fémoro acétabulaire au Japon.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Crawford JR, Villar RN (2005) Current concepts in the management of femoroacetabular impingement. J Bone Joint Surg Br 87:1459–1462

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Das De S, Bose K, Balasubramaniam P et al (1985) Surface morphology of Asian cadaveric hips. J Bone Joint Surg Br 67:225–228

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Ecker TM, Tannast M, Puls M et al (2007) Pathomorphologic alterations predict presence or absence of hip osteoarthrosis. Clin Orthop 465:46–52

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Ezoe M, Naito M, Inoue T (2006) The prevalence of acetabular retroversion among various disorders of the hip. J Bone Joint Surg Am 88:372–379

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Ganz R, Parvizi J, Beck M et al (2003) Femoroacetabular impingement. Clin Orthop 417:112–120

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Harris WH (1986) Etiology of osteoarthritis of the hip. Clin Orthop 213:20–33

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Hoaglund FT, Shiba R, Newberg AH (1985) Diseases of the hip. A comparative study of Japanese Oriental and American white patients. J Bone Joint Surg Am 67:1376–1383

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Ito K, Minka MA II, Leunig M et al (2001) Femoroacetabular impingement and the cam-effect: a MRI-based quantitative study of the femoral head-neck offset. J Bone Joint Surg Br 83:171–176

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Kim WY, Hutchinson CE, Andrew JG et al (2006) The relationship between acetabular retroversion and osteoarthritis of the hip. J Bone Joint Surg Br 88:727–729

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Meyer DC, Beck M, Ellis T et al (2006) Comparison of six radiographic projections to assess femoral head/neck asphericity. Clin Orthop 445:181–185

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Nakamura S, Ninomiya S, Nakamura T (1989) Primary osteoarthritis of the hip joint in Japan. Clin Orthop 241:190–196

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Nötzli HP, Wyss TF, Stoecklin CH et al (2002) The contour of the femoral head-neck junction as a predictor for the risk of anterior impingement. J Bone Joint Surg Br 84:556–560

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Siebenrock KA, Kalbermatten DF, Ganz R (2003) Effect of pelvic tilt on acetabular retroversion: a study of pelves from cadavers. Clin Orthop 407:241–248

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Solomon L (1976) Patterns of osteoarthritis of the hip. J Bone Joint Surg Br 58:176–183

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Stulberg SD, Cordell LD, Harris WH et al (1975) Unrecognized childhood hip disease: a major cause of idiopathic osteoarthritis of the hip. The Hip. Proceedings of the third open scientific meeting of the Hip Society. St Louis, MO, Mosby, pp 212–228

  16. Tanzer M, Noseux N (2004) Osseous abnormalities and early osteoarthritis. Clin Orthop 429:170–177

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Tönnis D, Heinecke A (1999) Acetabular and femoral anteversion: relationship with osteoarthritis of the hip. J Bone Joint Surg Am 81:1747–1770

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

We do not have a financial relationship with the organisation that sponsored the research.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Akinori Takeyama.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Takeyama, A., Naito, M., Shiramizu, K. et al. Prevalence of femoroacetabular impingement in Asian patients with osteoarthritis of the hip. International Orthopaedics (SICOT) 33, 1229–1232 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-009-0742-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-009-0742-0

Keywords

Navigation