Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Prevalence of radiographic primary hip and knee osteoarthritis in a representative Central European population

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
International Orthopaedics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The aim of our study was to determine the radiographic prevalence of hip and knee osteoarthritis and compare our results with prevalence data reported by other studies, as no similar study had been performed in Hungary previously. Our aim was also to investigate the usefulness of the different radiological scoring methods for the definition of osteoarthritis. Patients who earlier reported complaints and gave written consent were asked to participate in a clinical follow-up. In the 682 participants Harris hip score, visual analogue pain scale values for both joints, Knee Society score and knee functional score were calculated. Weight-bearing radiographs were taken of both joints. Kellgren-Lawrence radiological evaluation was performed and osteoarthritis prevalence was defined. Hip osteoarthritis was found in 109 cases (16.49%), and knee osteoarthritis was found in 111 cases (16.54%). Harris hip score, Knee Society score, functional score and visual analogue scale values were significantly worse in people with radiographically proven osteoarthritis compared to the control group (p < 0.05). Significantly higher osteoarthritis prevalence of both joints was found in those with increased body mass index values. Age also plays a significant role in the development of both hip and knee osteoarthritis. No significant difference was observed between male and female participants regarding osteoarthritis prevalence. The Kellgren-Lawrence score with a cut-off value of 2 or more is a useful evaluation method for the detection of osteoarthritis prevalence in epidemiological studies; according to our observations, in clinical practice a cut-off value of three or more is more relevant.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Zhang W, Doherty M (2006) EULAR recommendations for knee and hip osteoarthritis: a critique of the methodology. Br J Sports Med 40:664–669

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Iorio R, Robb WJ, Healy WL et al (2008) Orthopaedic surgeon workforce and volume assessment for total hip and knee replacement in the United States: preparing for an epidemic. J Bone Joint Surg Am 90:1598–1605

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Ingvarsson T (2000) Prevalence and inheritance of hip osteoarthritis in Iceland. Acta Orthop Scand Suppl 298:1–46

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Dagenais S, Garbedian S, Wai EK (2009) Systematic review of the prevalence of radiographic primary hip osteoarthritis. Clin Orthop Relat Res 467:623–637

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Kellgren J, Lawrence JS (1957) Radiological assessment of osteo-arthrosis. Ann Rheum Dis 16:494–502

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Schiphof D, de Klerk BM, Koes BW et al (2008) Good reliability, questionable validity of 25 different classification criteria of knee osteoarthritis: a systematic appraisal. J Clin Epidemiol 61:1205–1215

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. O’Reilly S, Doherty M (1998) Signs, symptoms and laboratory tests. In: Brandt KD, Doherty M, Lohmander LS (eds) Osteoarthritis. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 197–217

    Google Scholar 

  8. Horváth G, Than P, Bellyei Á et al (2006) Prevalence of degenerative joint complaints of the lower extremity: a representative study. Int Orthop 30:118–122

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Harris WH (1969) Traumatic arthritis of the hip after dislocation and acetabular fractures: treatment by mold arthroplasty. An end-result study using a new method of result evaluation. J Bone Joint Surg Am 51:737–755

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Insall JN, Dorr LD, Scott RD et al (1989) Rationale of the Knee Society clinical rating system. Clin Orthop Relat Res 248:13–14

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Birrell F, Lunt M, Macfarlane G et al (2005) Association between pain in the hip region and radiographic changes of osteoarthritis: results from a population-based study. Rheumatology (Oxford) 44:337–341

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Cvijetić S, Campbell L, Cooper C et al (2000) Radiographic osteoarthritis in the elderly population of Zagreb: distribution, correlates, and the pattern of joint involvement. Croat Med J 41:58–63

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Hoaglund FT, Yau MC, Wong WL (1973) Osteoarthritis of the hip and other joints in southern Chinese in Hong Kong. J Bone Joint Surg Am 55:545–557

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Lawrence JS, Sebo M (1980) The geography of osteoarthritis. In: Nuki G (ed) The aetiopathogenesis of osteoarthritis. Pitman, London, pp 155–183

    Google Scholar 

  15. Odding E, Valkenburg HA, Algra D et al (1998) Associations of radiological osteoarthritis of the hip and knee with locomotor disability in the Rotterdam Study. Ann Rheum Dis 57:203–208

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Danielsson L, Lindbergh H (1997) Prevalence of coxarthrosis in an urban population during four decades. Clin Orthop Relat Res 342:106–110

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Kessler S, Guenther KP, Puhl W (1998) Scoring prevalence and severity in gonarthritis: the suitability of the Kellgren & Lawrence scale. Clin Rheumatol 17:205–209

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Petersson IF, Boegård T, Saxne T et al (1997) Radiographic osteoarthritis of the knee classified by the Ahlbäck and Kellgren & Lawrence systems for the tibiofemoral joint in people aged 35–54 years with chronic knee pain. Ann Rheum Dis 56:493–496

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Sudo A, Miyamoto N, Horikawa K et al (2008) Prevalence and risk factors for knee osteoarthritis in elderly Japanese men and women. J Orthop Sci 13:413–418

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Felson DT, Zhang Y (1998) An update on the epidemiology of knee and hip osteoarthritis with a view to prevention. Arthritis Rheum 41:1343–1355

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Anderson JJ, Felson DT (1988) Factors associated with osteoarthritis of the knee in the first national Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (HANES I). Evidence for an association with overweight, race, and physical demands of work. Am J Epidemiol 128:179–189

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Hochberg MC, Lethbridge-Cejku M, Scott WW et al (1995) The association of body weight, body fatness and body fat distribution with osteoarthritis of the knee: data from the Baltimore Longitudinal Study of Aging. J Rheumatol 22:488–493

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Lachance L, Sowers MF, Jamadar D et al (2001) The experience of pain and emergent osteoarthritis of the knee. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 9:527–532

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Sowers M, Yosef M, Jamadar D et al (2008) BMI vs. body composition and radiographically defined osteoarthritis of the knee in women: a 4-year follow-up study. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 16:367–372

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gábor Horváth.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Horváth, G., Koroknai, G., Ács, B. et al. Prevalence of radiographic primary hip and knee osteoarthritis in a representative Central European population. International Orthopaedics (SICOT) 35, 971–975 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-010-1069-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-010-1069-6

Keywords

Navigation