Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The comparison of ultrasonographic and scintigraphic findings of early arthritis in revealing rheumatoid arthritis according to criteria of American College of Rheumatology

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Rheumatology International Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We aimed to investigate the diagnostic significance of high frequency ultrasonography (USG), comparing the findings in USG, bone scintigraphy and clinical stuation. Fifty-one patients who had early symptoms of inflammatory arthritis, but not fulfilling the ACR diagnostic criteria for rheumatoid arthritis (RA) were included in this study. They were referred to USG and bone scintigraphy for examination of the synovial joints. After following at least 2 years with visits at every 3 months, those who fulfilled the ACR criteria for the diagnosis of RA were defined as reference group. The concordance levels were assessed with Kappa statistic among them. The diagnosis of inflammatory arthritis that was made with USG in early time showed average agreement with the diagnosis according to ACR criteria. However, there was statistically discordance between the diagnosis of inflammatory arthritis that was made with bone scintigraphy in early time and the diagnosis according to ACR criteria.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Arnett FC, Edworthy SM, Bloch DA, McShane DJ, Fries JF, Cooper NS, Healey LA, Kaplan SR, Liang MH, Luthra HS (1988) The American Rheumatism Association 1987 revised criteria for the classification of rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum 31(3):315–324

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Harrison BJ, Symmons DP, Barrett EM, Silman AJ (1998) The performance of the 1987 ARA classification criteria for rheumatoid arthritis in a population based cohort of patients with early inflammatory polyarthritis. American Rheumatism Association. J Rheumatol 25(12):2324–2330

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Backhaus M, Kamradt T, Sandrock D, Loreck D, Fritz J et al (1999) Arthritis of the finger joints: a comprehensive approach comparing conventional radiography, scintigraphy, ultrasound, and contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging. Arthritis Rheum 42(6):232–245

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Emery P, Symmons DP (1997) What is early rheumatoid arthritis? Definition and diagnosis. Bailliere’s Clin Rheumatol 11(1):13–26

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Aletaha D, Eberl G, Nell VPK, Machold KP, Smolen JS (2004) Attitudes to early rheumatoid arthritis: changing patterns. Results of a survey. Ann Rheum Dis 63:1269–1275

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Quinn MA, Green MJ, Conaghan P, Emery P (2001) How do you diagnose rheumatoid arthritis early? Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol 15(1):49–66

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Van der Heijde DM, Van Leeuwen MA, Van Riel PL et al (1992) Biannual radiographic assessments of hands and feet in a three-year prospective follow-up of patients with early rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum 35:26–34

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Van der Heide A, Remme CA, Hofman DM, Jacobs JWG, Bijlsma JWJ (1995) Prediction of progression of radiologic damage in newly diagnosed rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum 38:1466–1474

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Van der Heijde D (1996) Plain X-rays in rheumatoid arthritis: overview of scoring methods, their reliability and applicability. Balliere’s Clin Rheumatol 10:435–453

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Backhaus M, Burmester GR, Sandrock D, Loreck D, Hess D, Scholz A, Blind S, Hamm B, Bollow M (2002) Prospective two year follow-up study comparing novel and conventional imaging procedures in patients with arthritic finger joints. Ann Rheum Dis 61(10):895–904

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Quinn M, Emery P (2005) Are early arthritis clinics necessary? Best Pract Res Clin Rheum 19(1):1–17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Emery P (1997) Prognosis in inflammatory arthritis: the value of HLA genotyping and oncological analogy. The Dunlop Dotteridge Lecture. J Rheumatol 24:1436–1442

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Wakefield RJ, Gibbon WW, Conaghan PG, O’Connor P, McGonagle D, Pease C, Green MJ, Veale DJ, Isaacs JD, Emery P (2000) The value of sonography in the detection of bone erosions in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a comparison with conventional radiography. Arthritis Rheum 43:2762–2770

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Manger B, Kalden JR (1995) Joint and connective tissue ultrasonography—a rheumatologic bedside procedure? A German experience. Arthritis Rheum 38(6):736–742

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Szkudlarek M, Court-Payen M, Jacobsen S, Klarlund M, Thomsen HS, Ostergaard M (2003) Interobserver agreement in ultrasonography of the finger and toe joints in rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum 48(4):955–962

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Brown AK, Wakefield RJ, Conaghan PG, Karim Z, O’Connor PJ, Emery P (2004) New approaches to imaging early inflammatory arthritis. Clin Exp Rheumatol 22(Suppl 35):18–25

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Evren Yasar.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ozgul, A., Yasar, E., Arslan, N. et al. The comparison of ultrasonographic and scintigraphic findings of early arthritis in revealing rheumatoid arthritis according to criteria of American College of Rheumatology. Rheumatol Int 29, 765–768 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00296-008-0765-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00296-008-0765-7

Keywords

Navigation