Abstract
The objective of this study is to estimate the value of diffusion-weighted MRI (DWI) in the detection of abnormalities in sacroiliac joints in the patients with early ankylosing spondylitis (AS) and investigate the feasibility of whole-body DWI (WB-DWI) in systemic evaluation of AS. Sixteen patients with early AS, 18 patients with simple low back pain (LBP), and 18 healthy volunteers were involved in this study. All subjects underwent conventional MRI and DWI. Apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) in subchondral bone marrows of sacroiliac joints was measured. Independent-sample t test was used to statistically analyze the difference of ADC values between groups. WB-DWI was performed in additional 12 patients with clinically confirmed AS. The image results were analyzed by multiple post-processing techniques, as compared to conventional MRI. In AS patients, mean ADC values were (0.494 ± 0.170) × 10−3 mm2/s in sacrum and (0.513 ± 0.129) × 10−3 mm2/s in ilium, which were significantly higher than those of LBP ((0.306 ± 0.057) × 10−3 mm2/s in sacrum and (0.323 ± 0.083) × 10−3 mm2/s in ilium) and healthy volunteers ((0.315 ± 0.009) × 10−3 mm2/s in sacrum and (0.319 ± 0.012) × 10−3 mm2/s in ilium). No statistical differences were found between simple LBP and healthy volunteers. Mean ADC value of multiple lesions in AS was (0.932 ± 0.299) × 10−3 mm2/s. By WB-DWI, abnormal signals of sacroiliac joints and extra-sacroiliac joint lesions were demonstrated in the locations corresponding with clinical findings. Mean ADC values of multiple lesions were (1.298 ± 0.323) × 10−3 mm2/s in sacrum and (1.216 ± 0.311) × 10−3 mm2/s in ilium. DWI and WB-DWI were shown to be effective in differentiation and systemic evaluation of early AS. Both techniques are likely to play an importance role in the early diagnosis of AS and assessment of treatment response.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Moll JM, Haslock I, Macrae IF, Wright V (1974) Associations between ankylosing spondylitis, psoriatic arthritis, Reiter’s disease, the intestinal arthropathies, and Behcet’s syndrome. Medicine (Baltimore) 53(5):343–364
Braun J, Sieper J (1996) The sacroiliac joint in the spondyloarthropathies. Curr Opin Rheumatol 8(4):275–287
Boonen A, van der Linden SM (2006) The burden of ankylosing spondylitis. J Rheumatol Suppl 78:4–11
Weber U, Maksymowych WP (2011) Sensitivity and specificity of magnetic resonance imaging for axial spondyloarthritis. Am J Med Sci 341(4):272–277. doi:10.1097/MAJ.0b013e31820f8c59
Mau W, Zeidler H, Mau R, Majewski A, Freyschmidt J, Stangel W, Deicher H (1988) Clinical features and prognosis of patients with possible ankylosing spondylitis. Results of a 10-year followup. J Rheumatol 15(7):1109–1114
Oostveen J, Prevo R, den Boer J, van de Laar M (1999) Early detection of sacroiliitis on magnetic resonance imaging and subsequent development of sacroiliitis on plain radiography. A prospective, longitudinal study. J Rheumatol 26(9):1953–1958
Ostergaard M, Poggenborg RP, Axelsen MB, Pedersen SJ (2010) Magnetic resonance imaging in spondyloarthritis—how to quantify findings and measure response. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol 24(5):637–657. doi:10.1016/j.berh.2010.06.001
Braun J, Bollow M, Eggens U, Konig H, Distler A, Sieper J (1994) Use of dynamic magnetic resonance imaging with fast imaging in the detection of early and advanced sacroiliitis in spondylarthropathy patients. Arthritis Rheum 37(7):1039–1045
Zochling J, Baraliakos X, Hermann KG, Braun J (2007) Magnetic resonance imaging in ankylosing spondylitis. Curr Opin Rheumatol 19(4):346–352. doi:10.1097/BOR.0b013e32816a938c
Maksymowych WP (2009) MRI in ankylosing spondylitis. Curr Opin Rheumatol 21(4):313–317
Chary-Valckenaere I, d’Agostino MA, Loeuille D (2011) Role for imaging studies in ankylosing spondylitis. Jt Bone Spine 78(2):138–143. doi:10.1016/j.jbspin.2010.07.008
Sugahara T, Korogi Y, Kochi M, Ikushima I, Shigematu Y, Hirai T, Okuda T, Liang L, Ge Y, Komohara Y, Ushio Y, Takahashi M (1999) Usefulness of diffusion-weighted MRI with echo-planar technique in the evaluation of cellularity in gliomas. J Magn Reson Imaging 9(1):53–60
Squillaci E, Manenti G, Cova M, Di Roma M, Miano R, Palmieri G, Simonetti G (2004) Correlation of diffusion-weighted MR imaging with cellularity of renal tumours. Anticancer Res 24(6):4175–4179
Eriksen EF, Ringe JD (2011) Bone marrow lesions: a universal bone response to injury? Rheumatol Int. doi:10.1007/s00296-011-2141-2
Chan JH, Peh WC, Tsui EY, Chau LF, Cheung KK, Chan KB, Yuen MK, Wong ET, Wong KP (2002) Acute vertebral body compression fractures: discrimination between benign and malignant causes using apparent diffusion coefficients. Br J Radiol 75(891):207–214
Bozgeyik Z, Ozgocmen S, Kocakoc E (2008) Role of diffusion-weighted MRI in the detection of early active sacroiliitis. AJR Am J Roentgenol 191(4):980–986. doi:10.2214/AJR.07.3865
Yeung DK, Wong SY, Griffith JF, Lau EM (2004) Bone marrow diffusion in osteoporosis: evaluation with quantitative MR diffusion imaging. J Magn Reson Imaging 19(2):222–228. doi:10.1002/jmri.10453
Konca S, Keskin D, Ciliz D, Bodur H, Sakman B (2011) Spinal inflammation by magnetic resonance imaging in patients with ankylosing spondylitis: association with disease activity and outcome parameters. Rheumatol Int. doi:10.1007/s00296-011-2248-5
Nakanishi K, Kobayashi M, Nakaguchi K, Kyakuno M, Hashimoto N, Onishi H, Maeda N, Nakata S, Kuwabara M, Murakami T, Nakamura H (2007) Whole-body MRI for detecting metastatic bone tumor: diagnostic value of diffusion-weighted images. Magn Reson Med Sci 6(3):147–155
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China, No. 30870701 and No. 81071133.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Tao Ai contributed equally to this work and should be considered co-first author.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ai, F., Ai, T., Li, X. et al. Value of diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging in early diagnosis of ankylosing spondylitis. Rheumatol Int 32, 4005–4013 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00296-011-2333-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00296-011-2333-9