Skip to main content
Log in

Value of diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging in early diagnosis of ankylosing spondylitis

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Rheumatology International Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The objective of this study is to estimate the value of diffusion-weighted MRI (DWI) in the detection of abnormalities in sacroiliac joints in the patients with early ankylosing spondylitis (AS) and investigate the feasibility of whole-body DWI (WB-DWI) in systemic evaluation of AS. Sixteen patients with early AS, 18 patients with simple low back pain (LBP), and 18 healthy volunteers were involved in this study. All subjects underwent conventional MRI and DWI. Apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) in subchondral bone marrows of sacroiliac joints was measured. Independent-sample t test was used to statistically analyze the difference of ADC values between groups. WB-DWI was performed in additional 12 patients with clinically confirmed AS. The image results were analyzed by multiple post-processing techniques, as compared to conventional MRI. In AS patients, mean ADC values were (0.494 ± 0.170) × 10−3 mm2/s in sacrum and (0.513 ± 0.129) × 10−3 mm2/s in ilium, which were significantly higher than those of LBP ((0.306 ± 0.057) × 10−3 mm2/s in sacrum and (0.323 ± 0.083) × 10−3 mm2/s in ilium) and healthy volunteers ((0.315 ± 0.009) × 10−3 mm2/s in sacrum and (0.319 ± 0.012) × 10−3 mm2/s in ilium). No statistical differences were found between simple LBP and healthy volunteers. Mean ADC value of multiple lesions in AS was (0.932 ± 0.299) × 10−3 mm2/s. By WB-DWI, abnormal signals of sacroiliac joints and extra-sacroiliac joint lesions were demonstrated in the locations corresponding with clinical findings. Mean ADC values of multiple lesions were (1.298 ± 0.323) × 10−3 mm2/s in sacrum and (1.216 ± 0.311) × 10−3 mm2/s in ilium. DWI and WB-DWI were shown to be effective in differentiation and systemic evaluation of early AS. Both techniques are likely to play an importance role in the early diagnosis of AS and assessment of treatment response.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Moll JM, Haslock I, Macrae IF, Wright V (1974) Associations between ankylosing spondylitis, psoriatic arthritis, Reiter’s disease, the intestinal arthropathies, and Behcet’s syndrome. Medicine (Baltimore) 53(5):343–364

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Braun J, Sieper J (1996) The sacroiliac joint in the spondyloarthropathies. Curr Opin Rheumatol 8(4):275–287

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Boonen A, van der Linden SM (2006) The burden of ankylosing spondylitis. J Rheumatol Suppl 78:4–11

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Weber U, Maksymowych WP (2011) Sensitivity and specificity of magnetic resonance imaging for axial spondyloarthritis. Am J Med Sci 341(4):272–277. doi:10.1097/MAJ.0b013e31820f8c59

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Mau W, Zeidler H, Mau R, Majewski A, Freyschmidt J, Stangel W, Deicher H (1988) Clinical features and prognosis of patients with possible ankylosing spondylitis. Results of a 10-year followup. J Rheumatol 15(7):1109–1114

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Oostveen J, Prevo R, den Boer J, van de Laar M (1999) Early detection of sacroiliitis on magnetic resonance imaging and subsequent development of sacroiliitis on plain radiography. A prospective, longitudinal study. J Rheumatol 26(9):1953–1958

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Ostergaard M, Poggenborg RP, Axelsen MB, Pedersen SJ (2010) Magnetic resonance imaging in spondyloarthritis—how to quantify findings and measure response. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol 24(5):637–657. doi:10.1016/j.berh.2010.06.001

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Braun J, Bollow M, Eggens U, Konig H, Distler A, Sieper J (1994) Use of dynamic magnetic resonance imaging with fast imaging in the detection of early and advanced sacroiliitis in spondylarthropathy patients. Arthritis Rheum 37(7):1039–1045

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Zochling J, Baraliakos X, Hermann KG, Braun J (2007) Magnetic resonance imaging in ankylosing spondylitis. Curr Opin Rheumatol 19(4):346–352. doi:10.1097/BOR.0b013e32816a938c

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Maksymowych WP (2009) MRI in ankylosing spondylitis. Curr Opin Rheumatol 21(4):313–317

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Chary-Valckenaere I, d’Agostino MA, Loeuille D (2011) Role for imaging studies in ankylosing spondylitis. Jt Bone Spine 78(2):138–143. doi:10.1016/j.jbspin.2010.07.008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Sugahara T, Korogi Y, Kochi M, Ikushima I, Shigematu Y, Hirai T, Okuda T, Liang L, Ge Y, Komohara Y, Ushio Y, Takahashi M (1999) Usefulness of diffusion-weighted MRI with echo-planar technique in the evaluation of cellularity in gliomas. J Magn Reson Imaging 9(1):53–60

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Squillaci E, Manenti G, Cova M, Di Roma M, Miano R, Palmieri G, Simonetti G (2004) Correlation of diffusion-weighted MR imaging with cellularity of renal tumours. Anticancer Res 24(6):4175–4179

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Eriksen EF, Ringe JD (2011) Bone marrow lesions: a universal bone response to injury? Rheumatol Int. doi:10.1007/s00296-011-2141-2

  15. Chan JH, Peh WC, Tsui EY, Chau LF, Cheung KK, Chan KB, Yuen MK, Wong ET, Wong KP (2002) Acute vertebral body compression fractures: discrimination between benign and malignant causes using apparent diffusion coefficients. Br J Radiol 75(891):207–214

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Bozgeyik Z, Ozgocmen S, Kocakoc E (2008) Role of diffusion-weighted MRI in the detection of early active sacroiliitis. AJR Am J Roentgenol 191(4):980–986. doi:10.2214/AJR.07.3865

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Yeung DK, Wong SY, Griffith JF, Lau EM (2004) Bone marrow diffusion in osteoporosis: evaluation with quantitative MR diffusion imaging. J Magn Reson Imaging 19(2):222–228. doi:10.1002/jmri.10453

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Konca S, Keskin D, Ciliz D, Bodur H, Sakman B (2011) Spinal inflammation by magnetic resonance imaging in patients with ankylosing spondylitis: association with disease activity and outcome parameters. Rheumatol Int. doi:10.1007/s00296-011-2248-5

  19. Nakanishi K, Kobayashi M, Nakaguchi K, Kyakuno M, Hashimoto N, Onishi H, Maeda N, Nakata S, Kuwabara M, Murakami T, Nakamura H (2007) Whole-body MRI for detecting metastatic bone tumor: diagnostic value of diffusion-weighted images. Magn Reson Med Sci 6(3):147–155

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China, No. 30870701 and No. 81071133.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Xiaoming Li.

Additional information

Tao Ai contributed equally to this work and should be considered co-first author.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ai, F., Ai, T., Li, X. et al. Value of diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging in early diagnosis of ankylosing spondylitis. Rheumatol Int 32, 4005–4013 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00296-011-2333-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00296-011-2333-9

Keywords

Navigation