Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

ANCA testing: the current stage and perspectives

  • Review Article
  • The Asia Pacific Meeting of Vasculitis and ANCA Workshop 2012
  • Published:
Clinical and Experimental Nephrology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

During the past 30 years, remarkable progress has been achieved in understanding the role of the antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies (ANCAs) directed against proteinase 3 (PR3) and myeloperoxidase (MPO) in so-called “ANCA-associated vasculitides”. In the right clinical context, ANCAs are a good seromarker for these diseases, have improved nomenclature of systemic vasculitides and have contributed to new pathogenic concepts. However, problems with the clinical applications of ANCA testing in daily practice remain. They can be summarised as follows: assay standardisation and performance; the use of ANCA testing in a clinical setting with a low pretest probability; the relationship between ANCA titres and disease activity remains unclear. The solution to problems regarding the ANCA diagnosis is focussed on the fundamental methods, i.e., correct implementation of IFT and ELISA, the cautious use of commercial assays and restricting the use of the tests to clinical situations with a rather high pretest probability of AAV.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Davies DJ, Moran JE, Niall JF, et al. Segmental necrotizing glomerulonephritis with antineutrophil antibody: possible arbovirus aetiology? Br Med J. 1982;285:606.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Van der Woude FJ, Rasmussen N, Lobatto S. Autoantibodies against neutrophils and monocytes: tool for diagnosis and marker of disease activity in Wegener’s granulomatosis. Lancet. 1985;1:425–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Hagen EC, Daha MR, Hermans J, Andrassy K, Csernok E, Gaskin G, Lesavre P, Ludemann J, Rasmussen N, Sinico RA, Wiik A, van der Woude FJ. Diagnostic value of standardized assays for anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies in idiopathic systemic vasculitis. EC/BCR Project for ANCA Assay Standardization. Kidney Int. 1998;53:743–53.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Savige J, Gillis D, Benson E, Davies D, Esnault V, Falk RJ, Hagen EC, Jayne D, Jennette JC, Paspaliaris B, Pollock W, Pusey C, Savage CO, Silvestrini R, van der Woude F, Wieslander J, Wiik A. International consensus statement on testing and reporting of antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies (ANCA). Am J Clin Pathol. 1999;111:507–13.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Holle JU, Hellmich B, Backes M, Gross WL, Csernok E. Variations in performance characteristics of commercial enzyme immunoassay kits of the detection of antineutrophil cytoplasmatic antibodies: what is the optimal cut-off? Ann Rheum Dis. 2005;64:1773–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Csernok E, Holle J, Hellmich B, Willem J, Tervaert C, Kallenberg CG, Limburg PC, Niles J, Pan G, Specks U, Westman K, Wieslander J, De Groot K, Gross WL. Evaluation of capture ELISA for detection of neutrophil cytoplasmatic antibodies directed against proteinase 3 in Wegener’s granulomatosis: first results from a multicenter study. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2004;43(2):174–80.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Hellmich B, Csernok E, Fredenhagen G, Gross WL. A novel high sensitivity ELISA for detection of antineutrophil cytoplasm antibodies against proteinase-3. Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2007;25(44):1–5.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Holle JU, Herrmann K, Gross WL, Csernok E. Comparative analysis of different commercial ELISA systems for detection of anti-neutrophil cytoplasm antibodies in ANCA-associated vasculitides. Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2012;30(1 Suppl 70):S66–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Pollock W, Trevisin M, Savige J. Testing on formalin-fixed neutrophils is less sensitive and specific for small vessel vasculitis, and less sensitive for MPO-ANCA, than most ELISAs. J Immunol Methods. 2008;339(82):141–5.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Csernok E, Holle JU. Twenty-years with ANCA: how to test for ANCA –evidence based immunology? Autoimmun Highlights. 2010;1(1):39–45.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Sinclair D, Saas M, Stevens JM. The effect of a symptom related “gating policy” on ANCA requests in routine clinical practice. J Clin Pathol. 2004;57:131–4.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Arnold DF, Timms A, Luqmani R, Misbach SA. Does a gating policy for ANCA overlook patients with ANCA associated vasculitis? An audit of 263 patients. J Clin Pathol. 2010;63(6):678–80.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Tomasson G, Grayson PC, Mahr AD, Lavalley M, Merkel PA. Value of ANCA measurements during remission to predict a relapse of ANCA-associated vasculitis-a meta-analysis. Rheumatology. 2012;51(1):100–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Csernok E, Gross WL. Diagnostic significance of ANCA in vasculitis. Nat Clin Pract Rheumatol. 2006;2(4):174–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

The author declares no conflict of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Elena Csernok.

About this article

Cite this article

Csernok, E. ANCA testing: the current stage and perspectives. Clin Exp Nephrol 17, 615–618 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10157-012-0735-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10157-012-0735-y

Keywords

Navigation