Introduction
The term spondyloarthropathy or spondyloarthritis (SpA) refers to a group of diseases which includes axial spondyloarthritis (ankylosing spondylitis and non-radiographic axial spondyloarthritis), psoriatic arthritis, arthritis associated with inflammatory bowel diseases, and reactive arthritis [1••]. Chronic inflammation involving the axial and peripheral skeleton as well as variable affection of the skin, gut, and eyes are the central features to these diseases. Axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) is characterized by low back pain from chronic inflammation, which may progress to structural damage to the sacroiliac joints and spine, with or without formation of syndesmophytes and ankyloses. In addition to the joints and extra-articular manifestations, these diseases can be associated with various comorbidities which should be taken into account while managing patients with SpA. In this review, we will focus on comorbidities associated with axial spondyloarthritis, mainly the ankylosing spondylitis as data on comorbidities on non-radiographic axSpA are scant.
What is comorbidity?
“Any distinct additional entity that has existed or may occur during the clinical course of a patient who has the index disease under study” [2]. Comorbidity can have adverse impact on health outcomes, management of index condition, and associated with increased health care costs. Comorbid conditions can either be linked to the disease process, its treatment, or independent important findings. They can contribute to the disease burden, prognosis, morbidity, as well as mortality. Axial spondyloarthritis is associated with various comorbidities. Inflammatory bowel disease, psoriasis, and uveitis are components of various spondyloarthritis, so whether these conditions are part of the disease process or should be considered as comorbidities is debatable. However, as these conditions are very well described in relation to SpA, in this article, we will focus on other common comorbidities of axial SpA such as hypertension, gastroduodenal ulcers, osteoporosis and vertebral fractures, myocardial infarction, stroke, sleep apnea, and lung and renal diseases.
Advertisement
Cardiovascular diseases
Hypertension
Hypertension has been reported to be one of the most prevalent comorbidities in patients with ankylosing spondylitis (AS). In a population-based study involving 11,701 patients with AS in Taiwan, 16.4% of patients had hypertension, and the prevalence was significantly high as compared to 58,505 controls [3•]. Prevalence of hypertension was increased twofold compared to the general population according to the results of a cohort study from Sweden involving 935 patients [4]. In a large international study (ASAS-COMOSPA) involving 3984 axial SpA patients, 33% had hypertension [5•]. Chronic daily intake of NSAIDs may be associated with increased prevalence of hypertension in AS. Young-onset hypertension may contribute to the increased cardiovascular risk in AS.
Dyslipidemia
AS patients can have low high-density lipoprotein (HDL) levels. In a meta-analysis of eight longitudinal studies involving 3279 AS patients and 82,745 controls, AS patients were found to have significantly low levels of HDL, triglyceride, and total cholesterol [6]. A cross-sectional study done by Papadakis et al. revealed increased prevalence of metabolic syndrome (34%) in 60 AS patients as compared to controls (19%); they also confirmed the low HDL in AS compared to controls [7].
Myocardial infarction
The role of inflammation in premature atherosclerosis is well recognized [8••]. Premature inflammatory atherosclerosis as well as conventional risk factors such as hypertension, diabetes, and smoking may contribute towards the increased risk of myocardial infarction among AS patients. Some of the specific contributory factors include decreased physical activity, genetic factors [9], and higher frequency of metabolic syndrome in AS patients [10]. NSAID and Cox-2 inhibitor use has been reported to increase the risk of vascular diseases [11], but a recent study by Haroon et al. showed a protective effect of traditional NSAIDs on vascular mortality in aged 66 or older AS patients and no increased mortality with Cox-2 inhibitor use [12].
Majority of, but not all, studies until now have suggested that patients with AS are at higher risk of developing acute coronary syndrome (ACS) as compared to the general population. In a recent study from Sweden, cardiovascular risk was assessed in 5358 AS patients, 37,245 rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients, and 25,006 matched general population subjects. They found a 30% increased risk of ACS in AS patients as compared to the general population; the age-/sex-adjusted relative risk for ACS was 1.3 (95% CI = 1.0–1.7) [13]. In a nationwide retrospective study from Taiwan involving 6262 AS patients and 25,048 controls, the overall incidence rate of ACS was higher (4.4 per 1000 person-years) in the AS cohort than in the non-AS cohort (2.9 per 1000 person-years) [14]. Peters et al. reported an overall prevalence for myocardial infarction (MI) of 4.4% in patients with AS and 1.2% in the general population, resulting in an age- and sex-adjusted odds ratio of 3.1 (95% CI = 1.9–5.1) for patients with AS [15]. A meta-analysis of seven longitudinal studies revealed a significant increase in MI in AS patients as compared to controls (OR = 1.6, 95% CI = 1.32–1.93). The incidence of MI was found to be 5.3% (1.6–11%) [16••] (see Fig. 1). The increased risk of MI was highest for younger individuals with AS and similar for both sexes [17] (Fig. 1).
×
Advertisement
However, there were two studies which reported no increased risk of cardiovascular disease in AS [18, 19]. In the study by Brophy et al., 1686 AS patients were compared to 1,206,621 controls. Age- and gender-adjusted hazard ratios for MI (1.28) and stroke (1.0) were not significantly elevated as compared to the controls despite the higher prevalence of hypertension and diabetes in AS patients [18]. In a recent study by Essers et al. involving 3809 AS patients and 26,197 controls, only a non-significant risk of ischemic heart disease (AMI, coronary artery bypass surgery, and percutaneous coronary intervention) was found in female AS patients after adjustment for age and NSAID use [19].
Stroke
Patients with AS are at 25% higher increased risk of cerebrovascular diseases including ischemic stroke compared to the general population. Risk of cerebrovascular disease tends to be higher in patients aged between 20 and 39 years [17]. In a study involving 4562 AS patients aged 20–39 years, the hazard ratio (HR) for stroke was reported to be 1.93 after controlling for medical and demographic comorbidities [20]. The risk of recurrent stroke was also reported to be 2.3 times higher compared to the control population [21]. AS patients have significantly increased carotid intima media thickness, which correlates with age and disease duration [22]. Cerebrovascular disease in AS is thought to be from accelerated atherosclerosis as well as increased prevalence of traditional risk factors. Studies on the effect of traditional and biologic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs) on stroke risk in patients with AS have yielded conflicting results [23, 24]. In a meta-analysis of three longitudinal studies involving 9791 AS patients, the risk of stroke was higher among AS patients compared to the controls (OR = 1.50, 95% CI = 1.39–1.62). The incidence of stroke in AS patients in ten longitudinal studies was found to be 3.6% (1.5–6.5%) [16••]. However, in the study by Brophy et al., the risk of MI and stroke was not found to be higher in AS patients as compared to controls despite having a higher prevalence of hypertension in the former group [18] (Fig. 2).
×
Osteoporosis and fractures in AS
It is well known that patients with AS are at increased risk of osteoporosis [25‐27] as well as vertebral fractures [28‐31] even at the early stages of the disease. Osteoporosis in patients with AS is often under-recognized and possibly undertreated [32]. The reported prevalence of osteoporosis in AS ranges from 13 and 25% [26, 33, 34]. Simultaneous presence of new syndesmophytes and bone loss in AS suggest uncoupling of bone formation and resorption [35]. The frequency of osteoporosis among AS patients is greater in patients >50 years of age, and the osteoporosis is associated with elevated CRP levels [33].
Measuring bone density at the spine in AS patients poses a particular challenge of the false high dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) readings due to syndesmophyte formation, sclerosis of the vertebral margins, and ligament ossification [36, 37]. Measurement of hip BMD (total hip or femoral neck) may be the more accurate means of detecting osteopenia or osteoporosis. Femoral neck BMD is also reduced in patients with AS, both with early and advanced disease, and correlates with increased risk of vertebral fractures [38, 39]. Lateral lumbar DXA can detect more cases of osteoporosis as compared with traditional anterior–posterior DXA measurement as the presence of syndesmophytes does not influence the lateral measurement [26]. In some cases, quantitative CT may be considered, which can show trabecular bone loss even in the presence of false elevated DXA readings [40]. The ACR-SPARTAN guidelines for axial spondyloarthritis recommend “DXA scanning of the spine as well as the hips, compared to DXA scanning solely of the hip or other non-spine sites. The age and sex of the patient, the patient’s level of physical activity, the duration and severity of AS, and presence or absence of other risk factors for osteoporosis should be considered in deciding when to begin screening and at what interval scans should be done” [41•].
Early recognition of osteoporosis followed by timely and effective treatment, and along with prevention of physical trauma, may reduce the fracture risk in patients with AS. Monitoring for the response is also important [42]. ACR-SPARTAN recommends fall evaluation and counseling of patients with AS to prevent vertebral fractures. The treatment of osteoporosis in patients with AS should follow general guidelines and consensus for the management of osteoporosis, as in any other patient without AS. TNF inhibitors may have favorable effects on the bone density in AS patients [43, 44].
Prevalence of vertebral fractures in AS is variable, ranging from 10 to 40% [45‐47]. The study by Cooper et al. reported an increased odd ratio of 7.7% (95% CI = 4.3–12.6) for clinically significant vertebral fractures in AS as compared to the rate in the general population [48]. The consequences can be severe as patients with AS are 11 times more likely to sustain a spinal cord injury after a vertebral fracture as compared to the general population [49]. The morbidity and mortality associated with vertebral fractures in AS are high, with about 65% of fractures being associated with neurological complications [50].
Hyperextension injury is the most common mechanism of fracture, and the most common site is the lower cervical spine [51]. Underdiagnosis of vertebral fractures is common in AS patients as they have chronic back or neck pain, and any worsened pain is attributed to the disease itself rather than to a fracture. Also, it can be difficult to recognize fracture on plain radiograph in an AS patient with an already abnormal radiograph [52]. Patients with suspected fractures should undergo additional imaging, such as CT and/or MRI, if plain radiographs are inconclusive.
Obstructive sleep apnea
The prevalence of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) in AS is reported to be higher than that in the general population. According to the study by Kang and Lin, 12 out of 1411 AS patients had OSA (prevalence, 0.85%) as compared to 0.50% in the control population [53]. In a prospective study by Solak et al., 7 (22%) of 31 AS patients had OSA. The prevalence of OSA was higher in patients aged >35 years (40%) compared to those aged <35 years (6%) and also was higher with disease duration >5 years (35%). Sixteen (53%) patients had restrictive patterns on pulmonary function tests. Mean BMI was higher in the OSA group (28.2 ± 6.6) than in the non-OSA group (24.5 ± 4.3), but not statistically significantly different [54•]. AS could predispose subjects to sleep apnea syndrome through several mechanisms, including restriction of the oropharyngeal airway from cervical spine disease and compression of the respiratory center in the medulla from cervical spine involvement, resulting in central depression of respiration or restrictive pulmonary physiology [53, 54•].
Advertisement
On the other hand, OSA seems to be a chronic pro-inflammatory state by virtue of hypoxia-induced release of cytokines. Patients with OSA are at elevated risk of developing autoimmune inflammatory conditions, mainly RA, but also AS and SLE 6[53].
Gastroduodenal ulcers
Gastric and duodenal ulcers represent one of the most common comorbidities associated with AS. Gastrointestinal ulcer was reported in 10.7% (95% CI = 9.7–11.7) among 3984 AS patients in the ASAS-COMOSPA Study [4], which is higher compared to the population-based 1-year prevalence of peptic ulcer disease of 0.12–1.5% among the general population [55]. In a retrospective study by Kang et al., the prevalence of peptic ulcer among 11,701 patients with AS in Taiwan was 13.9%, which was increased as compared to 4.4% in 58,505 general population [2]. The increased prevalence of gastric and duodenal ulcers in AS is possibly related to NSAID use. Prospective cross-sectional endoscopic studies have reported that the prevalence of gastric and duodenal ulcers is 10–25% in patients with chronic arthritis treated with NSAIDs [56].
Depression
Even after adjusting for age, sex, comorbidities, urbanization, and monthly income, AS patients are at 1.7-fold increased risk of developing depression as compared to the general population [57]. In 1993, Barlow et al. reported that about one third of patients with AS experience a high level of depressive symptoms and that women report depression more frequently than men [58]. However, a recent study by Chen et al. reported no increased risk of developing depressive and anxiety disorders among female patients with AS [57]. A study by Meester et al. involving 1738 AS patients and 967,012 controls found an 80% increased rate of doctor-diagnosed depression in women with AS and 50% in men with AS compared to the general population seeking care [59].
In a nationwide population-based study of comorbidity profiles among patients with AS in Taiwan, it was found that patients with AS had a higher OR for mental illness, including depression and psychosis, than the comparison group [2]. Comorbid depression can lead to work disability, unemployment, decreased quality of life, and fatigue symptoms in patients with AS.
Advertisement
Malignancy risk
In a nationwide study using the Swedish National Patient Register involving 8707 patients with AS between 2001 and 2010, 1908 were treated with biologics. For AS patients, the HR of having lymphoma versus the general population was 0.9 (14 lymphomas, 95% CI = 0.5–1.6). The numbers and incidence of lymphoma were not materially different in TNFi-exposed versus TNFi-naive AS and psoriatic arthritis (PsA) patients, although the numbers of lymphomas were small. The distribution of lymphoma subtypes did not differ substantially between patients with AS or PsA and the general population [60]. In a recent collaborative study from ARTIS (Anti-Rheumatic Therapy in Sweden) and DANBIO (Danish (DANBIO) biologics) registers, TNF inhibitor use was not associated with increased risk of cancer in patients with spondyloarthritis. Also, spondyloarthritis was not associated with increased risk of the six most common cancer types (prostate, colorectal, breast, lymphoma, lung, and melanoma). There was a decreased risk of colorectal cancer in TNFi-naive patients with AS versus the general population [61••].
Infections
In a systematic review and meta-analysis involving 14 randomized controlled studies, the absolute risk of serious infections in AS patients not treated with TNF inhibitors was found to be low. The risk increased with use of TNF inhibitors, but the difference was significant [62]. In a longitudinal observational study involving 440 patients, biologic therapy was not associated with an increased risk of infection, but DMARD use appeared to confer some risk. The apparent lower rate of infection in patients with AS compared to RA was attributed to several factors: the younger age and lower frequency of comorbidities in AS, differing immunogenetic mechanisms, and differences in treatment [63]. This is in contrast to RA where serious infections and adverse events are common; incidence is about 6 per 10 patient-years [64].
Lung disease
Apical fibrosis is a well-recognized pulmonary complication of AS, particularly in patients with longer disease duration. It can be unilateral or bilateral and is associated with cystic changes. In a systematic review, the overall prevalence of apical fibrosis was low at 7%, but increased to 21% with disease duration of more than 10 years [65].
Apart from apical fibrosis, non-specific and incidental abnormalities on imaging, particularly HRCT, have been frequently reported in AS. In a systematic review of ten studies (303 patients), the prevalence of pulmonary abnormalities on chest HRCT of AS patients was 61%. A total of 185 patients (61%) had an abnormal thoracic HRCT: upper lobe fibrosis in 21 (6.9%), emphysema in 55 (18.1%), bronchiectasis in 33 (10.8%), and ground glass attenuation in 34 (11.2%). Non-specific interstitial abnormalities were observed in 101 (33%) patients [66].
Advertisement
Renal disease
Renal complications do occur in AS, and physicians need to be vigilant for early identification. Important comorbid renal diseases include chronic kidney disease, nephrolithiasis, IgA nephropathy, and amyloidosis. Patients with AS are at increased risk of developing nephrolithiasis. Predictors for nephrolithiasis include previous history of kidney stones, inflammatory bowel disease, high disease activity, and male sex [69].
A previous study had reported that amyloidosis and IgA nephropathy are the most common among the renal diseases associated with AS, accounting for approximately 60 and 30% of all renal complications [70]. Donmez et al. reported a prevalence of rectal or renal biopsy proven amyloidosis of 1.1% in a cohort of 730 AS patients at an academic center in Turkey [71]. A more recent population-based study involving 8616 patients with AS reported that the prevalence rates of renal complications (acute kidney injury, chronic kidney disease, and amyloidosis) were 3.4% of men and 2.1% of women with AS compared with 2.0% of men and 1.6% of women of the general population. Chronic kidney disease and acute kidney injury were the most common complications, while amyloidosis was rare [72]. With the earlier identification and effective treatment of spondyloarthritis, IgA nephropathy as well amyloidosis may not be as common as reported in older studies. Amyloidosis is a late complication and is associated with longer disease duration, old age, and severe disease activity. The outcome for patients with renal amyloidosis is poor and associated with reduced survival. TNF inhibitors have variable efficacy against IgA nephropathy and renal amyloidosis.
Conclusion
With improved awareness, modified classification criteria, and better imaging techniques, the early diagnosis of axSpA is possible. Rheumatologists should be aware of the common comorbidities associated with AS, such as hypertension, gastroduodenal ulcers, osteoporosis, MI, stroke, and sleep apnea. Assessment and management of pertinent comorbidities should become an integral part of the management of axSpA. The management of SpA can be tailored according to the presence of comorbid conditions. An ideal treatment regimen for axial SpA should provide a comprehensive multisystem care similar to the proposed Total Care Program for conditions such as psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis [73••, 74•]. Total care for axial SpA should be a comprehensive treatment program which intends to be inclusive of exemplary care of the musculoskeletal system, including care of the spine, peripheral joints, uveitis, along with other internal organ pathologies and psychosocial issues. Table 1 provides an outline of the total care program for axial SpA.
Table 1
Concept of total care in axial SpA
◘ Complete evaluation: musculoskeletal system, systemic examination, and eye and skin examination | |
◘ Educating both parents and children in the case of young SpA patients | |
◘ Exemplary physical therapy/exercise for control of spinal inflammation and pain | |
◘ Aggressive therapy of inflammatory arthritis: early appropriate use of biologics | |
◘ Identifying/ preventing/treating | • Comorbidities of axial SpA |
• Comorbidities from therapy (infection/malignancies) | |
◘ Wellness program: exercise, diet, de-addiction, and relaxation | |
◘ Building self-esteem: support group and counseling |
Thus, the therapeutic paradigm for axial SpA has shifted to a multisystem, multidisciplinary approach involving consultation with various subspecialists (including internal medicine, ophthalmology, endocrinology, cardiology, psychiatry, and dietary/lifestyle modification programs) who may best identify and treat the numerous conditions that may occur in concert with SpA. Failing to address the multiple comorbidities associated with SpA is incomplete management of the disease. It is understandable that a rheumatologist cannot be the primary health care provider. However, it is important for the rheumatologists who are managing SpA patients to work closely with the patients’ primary care providers to identify these potential comorbidities and provide appropriate referrals for eye care, physical therapy, management of metabolic syndrome, and other subspecialists as required by an individual patient for proper comprehensive health care of all axial SpA patients.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
Dr. Abhijeet Danve declares no conflict of interest.
Dr. Siba Raychaudhuri declares no conflict of interest.
Human and animal rights and informed consent
This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.
Source and grants
None.